Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563761›Full record

ArticleCells2022

In Silico, In Vitro, and Clinical Investigations of Cathepsin B and Stefin A mRNA Expression and a Correlation Analysis in Kidney Cancer.

Magdalena Rudzinska-Radecka, Anastasia S Frolova, Anastasia V Balakireva, Neonila V Gorokhovets, Vadim S Pokrovsky, Darina V Sokolova, Dmitry O Korolev, Natalia V Potoldykova, Andrey Z Vinarov, Alessandro Parodi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cathepsin Z/X: Breaking Down the Known and Unknown.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Activatable Photosensitizers: From Fundamental Principles to Advanced Designs.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential Regulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Magdalena Rudzinska-RadeckaInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-2128
Anastasia S FrolovaInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6980-0028
Anastasia V BalakirevaInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Neonila V GorokhovetsInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Vadim S PokrovskyDepartment of Biotechnology, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 1 Olympic Ave., 354340 Sochi, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4006-9320
Darina V SokolovaDepartment of Biotechnology, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 1 Olympic Ave., 354340 Sochi, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3972-2425
Dmitry O KorolevInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Natalia V PotoldykovaInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey Z VinarovInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9510-9487
Alessandro ParodiInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey A ZamyatninInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3046-4565
Sechenov University · RUPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cysteine protease Cathepsin B (CtsB) plays a critical role in multiple signaling pathways, intracellular protein degradation, and processing. Endogenous inhibitors regulate its enzymatic activity, including stefins and other cystatins. Recent data proved that CtsB is implicated in tumor extracellular matrix remodeling, cell invasion, and metastasis: a misbalance between cathepsins and their natural inhibitors is often considered a sign of disease progression. In the present study, we investigated CtsB and stefin A (StfA) expression in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). mRNA analysis unveiled a significant

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCystatinsKidney NeoplasmsCathepsin BCystatin AFemaleHumansMaleRNA, MessengerCathepsin BCSTA protein, humanCTSB protein, humanCystatin ACystatinsRNA, Messengercathepsin Bhuman specimensrenal cell carcinomastefin A

Identifiers

PMID35563761
PMCPMC9101197
OpenAlexW4224930396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.