Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563631›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Interplay between A-to-I Editing and Splicing of RNA: A Potential Point of Application for Cancer Therapy.

Anton O Goncharov, Victoria O Shender, Ksenia G Kuznetsova, Anna A Kliuchnikova, Sergei A Moshkovskii

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Lactobacillus for ribosome peptide editing cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  13. RNA Modifications Meet Tumors.Cancer management and research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anton O GoncharovFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-5655
Victoria O ShenderFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Ksenia G KuznetsovaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-4047
Anna A KliuchnikovaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9230-1238
Sergei A MoshkovskiiFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine named after Y.M. Lopukhin · RUInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 20-15-00072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing is a system of post-transcriptional modification widely distributed in metazoans which is catalyzed by ADAR enzymes and occurs mostly in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) before splicing. This type of RNA editing changes the genetic code, as inosine generally pairs with cytosine in contrast to adenosine, and this expectably modulates RNA splicing. We review the interconnections between RNA editing and splicing in the context of human cancer. The editing of transcripts may have various effects on splicing, and resultant alternatively spliced isoforms may be either tumor-suppressive or oncogenic. Dysregulated RNA splicing in cancer often causes the release of excess amounts of dsRNA into cytosol, where specific dsRNA sensors provoke antiviral-like responses, including type I interferon signaling. These responses may arrest cell division, causing apoptosis and, externally, stimulate antitumor immunity. Thus, small-molecule spliceosome inhibitors have been shown to facilitate the antiviral-like signaling and are considered to be potential cancer therapies. In turn, a cytoplasmic isoform of ADAR can deaminate dsRNA in cytosol, thereby decreasing its levels and diminishing antitumor innate immunity. We propose that complete or partial inhibition of ADAR may enhance the proapoptotic and cytotoxic effects of splicing inhibitors and that it may be considered a promising addition to cancer therapies targeting RNA splicing.

Indexed as

Adenosine DeaminaseNeoplasmsAdenosineAntiviral AgentsHumansInosineRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Double-StrandedRNA SplicingAdenosineAdenosine DeaminaseAntiviral AgentsInosineRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Double-StrandedADARanticancer immunitycancer therapydsRNARNA editingRNA splicingspliceosome inhibitortype I interferon

Identifiers

PMID35563631
PMCPMC9105294
OpenAlexW4229331962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.