Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563617›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

The Interaction of Anti-DNA Antibodies with DNA: Evidence for Unconventional Binding Mechanisms.

David S Pisetsky, Angel Garza Reyna, Morgan E Belina, Diane M Spencer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David S PisetskyDepartment of Medicine and Immunology, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Angel Garza ReynaEpigenomic Regulation in Development and Cancer Team, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Boston, MA 02142, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1465-0867
Morgan E BelinaDuke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Diane M SpencerDepartment of Medicine and Immunology, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Duke University · USBroad Institute · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · US

Funding

Engineering Polymers to Scavenge DAMPs in Arthritis and LupusR01AR073935 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEONG, KAM W, SULLENGER, BRUCE ALAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Cellular Sources of Self Antigen in SLEI01BX003772 · VA · DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PISETSKY, DAVID STEPHEN · 2018 to 2021
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003772NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies to DNA (anti-DNA) are the serological hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus, a prototypic autoimmune disease. These antibodies bind to conserved sites on single-stranded and double-stranded DNA and display variable region somatic mutations consistent with antigen selection. Nevertheless, the interaction of anti-DNA with DNA has unconventional features. Anti-DNA antibodies bind by a mechanism called monogamous bivalency, in which stable interaction requires contact of both Fab sites with determinants on the same extended DNA molecule; the size of this DNA can be hundreds to thousands of bases, especially in solid phase assays. This binding also requires the presence of the Fc portion of IgG, a binding mechanism known as Fc-dependent monogamous bivalency. As shown by the effects of ionic strength in association and dissociation assays, anti-DNA binding is primarily electrostatic. Like anti-DNA autoantibodies, anti-DNA antibodies that bind specifically to non-conserved sites on bacterial DNA, a type of anti-DNA found in otherwise healthy individuals, also interact by monogamous bivalency. The unconventional features of anti-DNA antibodies may reflect the highly charged and polymeric nature of DNA and the need for molecular rearrangements to facilitate monogamous bivalency; the Fc portion contributes to binding in an as yet unknown way.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAntibodies, AntinuclearAutoantibodiesDNAHumansAntibodies, AntinuclearAutoantibodiesDNAanti-DNA antibodiesavidityDNAmonogamous bivalencysystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID35563617
PMCPMC9105193
OpenAlexW4229334165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.