Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563384›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Low Concentration of the Neutrophil Proteases Cathepsin G, Cathepsin B, Proteinase-3 and Metalloproteinase-9 Induce Biofilm Formation in Non-Biofilm-Forming

Itzia S Gómez-Alonso, Sergio Martínez-García, Gabriel Betanzos-Cabrera, Esmeralda Juárez, María C Sarabia-León, María Teresa Herrera, Fernando Gómez-Chávez, Luvia Sanchez-Torres, Sandra Rodríguez-Martínez, Mario E Cancino-Diaz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Search for Potentially VirulentInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Itzia S Gómez-AlonsoLaboratorio de Inmunomicrobiología, Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9894-3298
Sergio Martínez-GarcíaLaboratorio de Inmunomicrobiología, Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.
Gabriel Betanzos-CabreraÁrea Académica de Nutrición, Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca 42160, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2027-6904
Esmeralda JuárezDepartamento de Investigación en Microbiología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias "Ismael Cosió Villegas", Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9036-004X
María C Sarabia-LeónDepartamento de Investigación en Microbiología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias "Ismael Cosió Villegas", Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
María Teresa HerreraDepartamento de Investigación en Microbiología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias "Ismael Cosió Villegas", Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7941-5468
Fernando Gómez-ChávezLaboratorio de Enfermedades Osteoarticulares e Inmunológicas, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Nacional de Medicina y Homeopatía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 073240, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5050-2143
Luvia Sanchez-TorresLaboratorio de Inmunidad Innata, Departamento de Inmunología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7128-849X
Sandra Rodríguez-MartínezLaboratorio de Inmunidad Innata, Departamento de Inmunología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.
Mario E Cancino-DiazLaboratorio de Inmunidad Innata, Departamento de Inmunología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-7892
Jorge CancinoPrograma Moscafrut SADER-IICA, Metapa de Domínguez 30860, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3287-3060
Juan C Cancino-DiazLaboratorio de Inmunomicrobiología, Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.
Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo · MX

Funding

Instituto Politécnico Nacional 20221193SIPInstituto Politécnico Nacional 20221352SIP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils play a crucial role in eliminating bacteria that invade the human body; however, cathepsin G can induce biofilm formation in a non-biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis 1457 strain, suggesting that neutrophil proteases may be involved in biofilm formation. Cathepsin G, cathepsin B, proteinase-3, and metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) from neutrophils were tested on the biofilm induction in commensal (skin isolated) and clinical non-biofilm-forming S. epidermidis isolates. From 81 isolates, 53 (74%) were aap+, icaA−, icaD− genotype, and without the capacity of biofilm formation under conditions of 1% glucose, 4% ethanol or 4% NaCl, but these 53 non-biofilm-forming isolates induced biofilm by the use of different neutrophil proteases. Of these, 62.3% induced biofilm with proteinase-3, 15% with cathepsin G, 10% with cathepsin B and 5% with MMP -9, where most of the protease-induced biofilm isolates were commensal strains (skin). In the biofilm formation kinetics analysis, the addition of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; a proteinase-3 inhibitor) showed that proteinase-3 participates in the cell aggregation stage of biofilm formation. A biofilm induced with proteinase-3 and DNAse-treated significantly reduced biofilm formation at an early time (initial adhesion stage of biofilm formation) compared to untreated proteinase-3-induced biofilm (p < 0.05). A catheter inoculated with a commensal (skin) non-biofilm-forming S. epidermidis isolate treated with proteinase-3 and another one without the enzyme were inserted into the back of a mouse. After 7 days of incubation period, the catheters were recovered and the number of grown bacteria was quantified, finding a higher amount of adhered proteinase-3-treated bacteria in the catheter than non-proteinase-3-treated bacteria (p < 0.05). Commensal non-biofilm-forming S. epidermidis in the presence of neutrophil cells significantly induced the biofilm formation when multiplicity of infection (MOI) 1:0.01 (neutrophil:bacteria) was used, but the addition of a cocktail of protease inhibitors impeded biofilm formation. A neutrophil:bacteria assay did not induce neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Our results suggest that neutrophils, in the presence of commensal non-biofilm-forming S. epidermidis, do not generate NETs formation. The effect of neutrophils is the production of proteases, and proteinase-3 releases bacterial DNA at the initial adhesion, favoring cell aggregation and subsequently leading to biofilm formation.

Indexed as

NeutrophilsPeptide HydrolasesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus epidermidisAnimalsBiofilmsCathepsin BCathepsin GMetalloproteasesMiceMyeloblastinCathepsin BCathepsin GMetalloproteasesMyeloblastinPeptide Hydrolasesbiofilmcathepsin Bcathepsin Gcommensalmetalloproteinase-9neutrophilproteinase-3Staphylococcus epidermidis

Identifiers

PMID35563384
PMCPMC9102557
OpenAlexW4225139994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.