ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Moving Average-Based Multitasking In Silico Classification Modeling: Where Do We Stand and What Is Next?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perturbation-Theory Machine Learning for Multi-Target Drug Discovery in Modern Anticancer Research.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Perturbation-theory machine learning for mood disorders: virtual design of dual inhibitors of NET and SERT proteins.BMC chemistry · 2025Article
- Ligand-Based Approach for Multi-Target Drug Discovery: PTML Modeling of Triple-Target Inhibitors.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Evaluating the utility of a high throughput thiol-containing fluorescent probe to screen for reactivity: A case study with the Tox21 library.Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Proanthocyanidin Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis by Path Analysis Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional in silico modeling is often viewed as 'one-target' or 'single-task' computer-aided modeling since it mainly relies on forecasting an endpoint of interest from similar input data. Multitasking or multitarget in silico modeling, in contrast, embraces a set of computational techniques that efficiently integrate multiple types of input data for setting up unique in silico models able to predict the outcome(s) relating to various experimental and/or theoretical conditions. The latter, specifically, based upon the Box-Jenkins moving average approach, has been applied in the last decade to several research fields including drug and materials design, environmental sciences, and nanotechnology. The present review discusses the current status of multitasking computer-aided modeling efforts, meanwhile describing both the existing challenges and future opportunities of its underlying techniques. Some important applications are also discussed to exemplify the ability of multitasking modeling in deriving holistic and reliable in silico classification-based models as well as in designing new chemical entities, either through fragment-based design or virtual screening. Focus will also be given to some software recently developed to automate and accelerate such types of modeling. Overall, this review may serve as a guideline for researchers to grasp the scope of multitasking computer-aided modeling as a promising in silico tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.