Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563143›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Improved 3D Printing and Cell Biology Characterization of Inorganic-Filler Containing Alginate-Based Composites for Bone Regeneration: Particle Shape and Effective Surface Area Are the Dominant Factors for Printing Performance.

Vera Bednarzig, Stefan Schrüfer, Tom C Schneider, Dirk W Schubert, Rainer Detsch, Aldo R Boccaccini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Heterogeneous and Composite Bioinks for 3D-Bioprinting of Complex Tissue.Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. A vascularizedMaterials today. Bio · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vera BednarzigDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-4835
Stefan SchrüferDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Polymers, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Tom C SchneiderDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Dirk W SchubertDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Polymers, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer DetschDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Aldo R BoccacciniDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-2955

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TRR 225Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany HY2Print (03XP0097C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of organic-inorganic 3D printed composites with enhanced properties in biomedical applications continues to increase. The present study focuses on the development of 3D printed alginate-based composites incorporating inorganic fillers with different shapes (angular and round), for bone regeneration. Reactive fillers (bioactive glass 13-93 and hydroxyapatite) and non-reactive fillers (inert soda-lime glass) were investigated. Rheological studies and the characterization of various extrusion-based parameters, including material throughput, printability, shape fidelity and filament fusion, were carried out to identify the parameters dominating the printing process. It was shown that the effective surface area of the filler particle has the highest impact on the printing behavior, while the filler reactivity presents a side aspect. Composites with angular particle morphologies showed the same high resolution during the printing process, almost independent from their reactivity, while composites with comparable amounts of round filler particles lacked stackability after printing. Further, it could be shown that a higher effective surface area of the particles can circumvent the need for a higher filler content for obtaining convincing printing results. In addition, it was proven that, by changing the particle shape, the critical filler content for the obtained adequate printability can be altered. Preliminary in vitro biocompatibility investigations were carried out with the bioactive glass containing ink. The 3D printed ink, forming an interconnected porous scaffold, was analyzed regarding its biocompatibility in direct or indirect contact with the pre-osteoblast cell line MC3T3-E1. Both kinds of cell tests showed increased viability and a high rate of proliferation, with complete coverage of the 3D scaffolds' surface already after 7 d post cell-seeding.

Indexed as

AlginatesBioprintingBone RegenerationHydrogelsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsAlginatesHydrogels3D printingalginatebioactive glassesorganic–inorganic compositesrheology

Identifiers

PMID35563143
PMCPMC9102030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.