Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563097›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Aluminium Nanoparticles as Efficient Adjuvants Compared to Their Microparticle Counterparts: Current Progress and Perspectives.

Ali Nazarizadeh, Alexander H Staudacher, Nicole L Wittwer, Tyron Turnbull, Michael P Brown, Ivan Kempson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Emerging Cationic Nanovaccines.Pharmaceutics · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali NazarizadehFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0935-5142
Alexander H StaudacherTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Nicole L WittwerTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2331-5799
Tyron TurnbullFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia.
Michael P BrownTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Ivan KempsonFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3886-9516
South Australia Pathology · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

Tour de Cure RSP-253-18/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aluminium (Al) compounds are used as adjuvants in human and veterinary prophylactic vaccines due to their improved tolerability compared to other adjuvants. These Al-based adjuvants form microparticles (MPs) of heterogeneous sizes ranging from ~0.5 to 10 µm and generally induce type 2 (Th2)-biased immune responses. However, recent literature indicates that moving from micron dimension particles toward the nanoscale can modify the adjuvanticity of Al towards type 1 (Th1) responses, which can potentially be exploited for the development of vaccines for which Th1 immunity is crucial. Specifically, in the context of cancer treatments, Al nanoparticles (Al-NPs) can induce a more balanced (Th1/Th2), robust, and durable immune response associated with an increased number of cytotoxic T cells compared to Al-MPs, which are more favourable for stimulating an oncolytic response. In this review, we compare the adjuvant properties of Al-NPs to those of Al-MPs in the context of infectious disease vaccines and cancer immunotherapy and provide perspectives for future research.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAluminumHumansAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAluminumVaccinesadjuvantaluminiumcancernanotechnologyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35563097
PMCPMC9101817
OpenAlexW4224318259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.