Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35563044›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

DNA Double-Strand Breaks as Pathogenic Lesions in Neurological Disorders.

Vincent E Provasek, Joy Mitra, Vikas H Malojirao, Muralidhar L Hegde

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of c-Abl in Alzheimer's Disease: Guilty or not Guilty?Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CRISPR-Based Gene Therapy for Brain Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent E ProvasekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5893-0230
Joy MitraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Vikas H MalojiraoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Muralidhar L HegdeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7333-8123
Houston Methodist · US

Funding

Novel Carbon Nanozyme Mechanisms for Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS094535 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI HEGDE, MURALIDHAR L, KENT, THOMAS · 2015 to 2024
$4.1M
Defining the altered FUS-PARP-1-DNA Ligase III axis and its implications to nuclear and mitochondrial genome damage response in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD)RF1NS112719 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HEGDE, MURALIDHAR L · 2020 to 2020
$2.0M
Etiological Linkage of DNA Damage/Repair Deficiency in Neurodegenerative DiseasesR01NS088645 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HEGDE, MURALIDHAR L · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
A new conditional TDPΔNLS knock-in mouse model generated using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to study the linkage of TDP-43 pathology to motor and cognitive defects in ALS, FTD and ADRDR03AG064266 · NIA · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HEGDE, MURALIDHAR L · 2020 to 2021
$162k
NIA NIH HHS R03AG064266NINDS NIH HHS R01NS088645NINDS NIH HHS R01NS094535NINDS NIH HHS RF1NS112719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The damage and repair of DNA is a continuous process required to maintain genomic integrity. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal type of DNA damage and require timely repair by dedicated machinery. DSB repair is uniquely important to nondividing, post-mitotic cells of the central nervous system (CNS). These long-lived cells must rely on the intact genome for a lifetime while maintaining high metabolic activity. When these mechanisms fail, the loss of certain neuronal populations upset delicate neural networks required for higher cognition and disrupt vital motor functions. Mammalian cells engage with several different strategies to recognize and repair chromosomal DSBs based on the cellular context and cell cycle phase, including homologous recombination (HR)/homology-directed repair (HDR), microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ), and the classic non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). In addition to these repair pathways, a growing body of evidence has emphasized the importance of DNA damage response (DDR) signaling, and the involvement of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family proteins in the repair of neuronal DSBs, many of which are linked to age-associated neurological disorders. In this review, we describe contemporary research characterizing the mechanistic roles of these non-canonical proteins in neuronal DSB repair, as well as their contributions to the etiopathogenesis of selected common neurological diseases.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedNervous System DiseasesAnimalsDNADNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairMammalsRecombinational DNA RepairDNAdementiaDNA damage responseDNA double-strand break repairhnRNPsneurodegenerationTDP-43

Identifiers

PMID35563044
PMCPMC9099445
OpenAlexW4224235324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.