Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562941›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Novel Strategies for Spinal Cord Regeneration.

Bogdan Costăchescu, Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu, Marius Gabriel Dabija, Raluca Ioana Teleanu, Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu, Lucian Eva

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Effects of chemogenetic virus injection and clozapine administration in spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. NcRNAs: a potential treatment for spinal cord injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bogdan Costăchescu"Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Adelina-Gabriela NiculescuDepartment of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-504X
Marius Gabriel Dabija"Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Raluca Ioana TeleanuDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, "Dr. Victor Gomoiu" Children's Hospital, 022102 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru Mihai GrumezescuDepartment of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-094X
Lucian Eva"Prof. Dr. N. Oblu" Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · ROUniversity of Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most devastating lesions, as it can damage the continuity and conductivity of the central nervous system, resulting in complex pathophysiology. Encouraged by the advances in nanotechnology, stem cell biology, and materials science, researchers have proposed various interdisciplinary approaches for spinal cord regeneration. In this respect, the present review aims to explore the most recent developments in SCI treatment and spinal cord repair. Specifically, it briefly describes the characteristics of SCIs, followed by an extensive discussion on newly developed nanocarriers (e.g., metal-based, polymer-based, liposomes) for spinal cord delivery, relevant biomolecules (e.g., growth factors, exosomes) for SCI treatment, innovative cell therapies, and novel natural and synthetic biomaterial scaffolds for spinal cord regeneration.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord RegenerationBiocompatible MaterialsHumansNerve RegenerationPolymersSpinal CordTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsPolymersbiomaterial scaffoldsdelivery nanosystemsspinal cord injuryspinal cord regenerationstem cellstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35562941
PMCPMC9102050
OpenAlexW4224217078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.