Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562815›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Experiences of recovery and a new care pathway for people with pain after total knee replacement: qualitative research embedded in the STAR trial.

Andrew Moore, Vikki Wylde, Julie Bruce, Nicholas Howells, Wendy Bertram, Christopher Eccleston, Rachael Gooberman-Hill

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew MooreBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. a.j.moore@bristol.ac.uk.
Vikki WyldeBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Julie BruceWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Nicholas HowellsNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Wendy BertramBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Christopher EcclestonCentre for Pain Research, The University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Rachael Gooberman-HillBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
North Bristol NHS Trust · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research RP-PG-0613-20001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 20% of people experience chronic postsurgical pain after total knee replacement. The STAR randomised controlled trial (ISCRTN92545361) evaluated the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a new multifaceted and personalised care pathway, compared with usual care, for people with pain at three months after total knee replacement. We report trial participants' experiences of postoperative pain and the acceptability of the STAR care pathway, which consisted of an assessment clinic at three months, and up to six follow-up telephone calls over 12 months.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 people (10 men, 17 women) between February 2018 and January 2020. Participants were sampled purposively from the care pathway intervention group and interviewed after completion of the final postoperative trial questionnaire at approximately 15 months after knee replacement. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

findingsMany participants were unprepared for the severity and impact of postoperative pain, which they described as extreme and constant and that tested their physical and mental endurance. Participants identified 'low points' during their recovery, triggered by stiffening, pain or swelling that caused feelings of anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophising. Participants described the STAR assessment clinic as something that seemed "perfectly normal" suggesting it was seamlessly integrated into NHS care. Even in the context of some ongoing pain, the STAR care pathway had provided a source of support and an opportunity to discuss concerns about their ongoing recovery.

conclusionsPeople who have knee replacement may be unprepared for the severity and impact of postoperative pain, and the hard work of recovery afterwards. This highlights the challenges of preparing patients for total knee replacement and suggests that clinical attention is needed if exercise and mobilising is painful beyond the three month postoperative period. The STAR care pathway is acceptable to people with pain after total knee replacement.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCost-Benefit AnalysisCritical PathwaysFemaleHumansMalePhysical Therapy ModalitiesPostoperative PainQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID35562815
PMCPMC9103301
OpenAlexW4280535130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.