Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562803›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2022

Machine learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis.

Suru Yue, Shasha Li, Xueying Huang, Jie Liu, Xuefei Hou, Yumei Zhao, Dongdong Niu, Yufeng Wang, Wenkai Tan, Jiayuan Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 226 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
45.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 314 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suru YueClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Shasha LiClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Xueying HuangClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Jie LiuClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Xuefei HouClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Yumei ZhaoClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Dongdong NiuClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Yufeng WangClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Wenkai TanDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China. 35080592@qq.com.
Jiayuan WuClinical Research Service Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, Guangdong Province, China. wujiay@gdmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4626-2773
Guangdong Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is the most common and serious complication of sepsis, accompanied by high mortality and disease burden. The early prediction of AKI is critical for timely intervention and ultimately improves prognosis. This study aims to establish and validate predictive models based on novel machine learning (ML) algorithms for AKI in critically ill patients with sepsis.

methodsData of patients with sepsis were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC- III) database. Feature selection was performed using a Boruta algorithm. ML algorithms such as logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, random forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and artificial neural network (ANN) were applied for model construction by utilizing tenfold cross-validation. The performances of these models were assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical application. Moreover, the discrimination of ML-based models was compared with those of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and the customized Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II model.

resultsA total of 3176 critically ill patients with sepsis were included for analysis, of which 2397 cases (75.5%) developed AKI during hospitalization. A total of 36 variables were selected for model construction. The models of LR, KNN, SVM, decision tree, random forest, ANN, XGBoost, SOFA and SAPS II score were established and obtained area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.7365, 0.6637, 0.7353, 0.7492, 0.7787, 0.7547, 0.821, 0.6457 and 0.7015, respectively. The XGBoost model had the best predictive performance in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical application among all models.

conclusionThe ML models can be reliable tools for predicting AKI in septic patients. The XGBoost model has the best predictive performance, which can be used to assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and implementing early interventions to reduce mortality.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjurySepsisCritical IllnessFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleAcute kidney injuryMachine learningMIMIC- III databasePrediction modelSepsis

Identifiers

PMID35562803
PMCPMC9101823
OpenAlexW4280556240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.