Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562793›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

A multisectoral approach to advance health equity in rural northern Arizona: county-level leaders' perspectives on health equity.

Dulce J Jiménez, Samantha Sabo, Mark Remiker, Melinda Smith, Alexandra E Samarron Longorio, Heather J Williamson, Carmenlita Chief, Nicolette I Teufel-Shone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dulce J JiménezCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 4065, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA. Dulce.jimenez@nau.edu.
Samantha SaboCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 4065, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Mark RemikerCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 4065, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Melinda SmithCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 4065, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Alexandra E Samarron LongorioCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 4065, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Heather J WilliamsonCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 4065, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Carmenlita ChiefCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 4065, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Nicolette I Teufel-ShoneCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 4065, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Northern Arizona University · US

Funding

SSCIMA: Integrating Analysis of Socio-economic Sub-population Dynamics to Improve Spatial Models of Infectious DiseaseU54MD012388 · NIMHD · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI Catherine R Propper · 2017 to 2026
$49.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultisectoral and public-private partnerships are critical in building the necessary infrastructure, policy, and political will to ameliorate health inequity. A focus on health equity by researchers, practitioners, and decision-makers prioritizes action to address the systematic, avoidable, and unjust differences in health status across population groups sustained over time and generations that are beyond the control of individuals. Health equity requires a collective process in shaping the health and wellbeing of the communities in which we live, learn, work, play, and grow. This paper explores multisectoral leaders' understanding of the social, environmental, and economic conditions that produce and sustain health inequity in northern Arizona, a geographically expansive, largely rural, and culturally diverse region.

methodsData are drawn from the Southwest Health Equity Research Collaborative's Regional Health Equity Survey (RHES). The RHES is a community-engaged, cross-sectional online survey comprised of 31 close-ended and 17 open-ended questions. Created to assess cross-sectoral regional and collective capacity to address health inequity and inform multisectoral action for improving community health, the RHES targeted leaders representing five rural northern Arizona counties and 13 sectors. Select open-ended questions were analyzed using an a priori coding scheme and emergent coding with thematic analysis.

resultsAlthough leaders were provided the definition and asked to describe the root causes of inequities, the majority of leaders described social determinants of health (SDoH). When leaders described root causes of health inequity, they articulated systemic factors affecting their communities, describing discrimination and unequal allocation of power and resources. Most leaders described the SDoH by discussing compounding factors of poverty, transportation, housing, and rurality among others, that together exacerbate inequity. Leaders also identified specific strategies to address SDoH and advance health equity in their communities, ranging from providing direct services to activating partnerships across organizations and sectors in advocacy for policy change.

conclusionOur findings indicate that community leaders in the northern Arizona region acknowledge the importance of multisectoral collaborations in improving health equity for the populations that they serve. However, a common understanding of health equity remains to be widely established, which is essential for conducting effective multisectoral work to advance health equity.

Indexed as

Health EquityArizonaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPublic HealthSocial Determinants of HealthCollective impactCommunity-engagedHealth equityMultisectoralSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID35562793
PMCPMC9100312
OpenAlexW4280552410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.