Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562773›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2022

Hospital-onset sepsis and community-onset sepsis in critical care units in Japan: a retrospective cohort study based on a Japanese administrative claims database.

Mayuko Tonai, Atsushi Shiraishi, Toshiyuki Karumai, Akira Endo, Hirotada Kobayashi, Kiyohide Fushimi, Yoshiro Hayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mayuko TonaiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan.
Atsushi ShiraishiEmergency and Trauma Center, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan. shiraishi.atsushi@kameda.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9192-625X
Toshiyuki KarumaiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9377-0818
Akira EndoTrauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5967-0776
Hirotada KobayashiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9516-6016
Kiyohide FushimiDepartment of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1894-0290
Yoshiro HayashiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital- and community-onset sepsis are significant sepsis subgroups. Japanese data comparing these subgroups are limited. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of hospital- and community-onset sepsis in critical care units in Japan.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis and Procedure Combination database. Adult patients admitted to critical care units with sepsis from April 2010 to March 2020 were included. Sepsis cases were identified based on ICD-10 codes for infectious diseases, procedure codes for blood culture tests, and medication codes for antimicrobials. Patients' characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and resource utilization were assessed. The in-hospital mortality between groups was compared using the Poisson regression generalized linear mixed-effect model.

resultsOf 516,124 patients, 52,183 (10.1%) had hospital-onset sepsis and 463,940 (89.9%) had community-onset sepsis. Hospital-onset sepsis was characterized by younger age, infrequent emergency hospitalization, frequent surgery under general anesthesia, and frequent organ support upon critical care unit admission compared to community-onset sepsis. In-hospital mortality was higher for hospital-onset than for community-onset sepsis (35.5% versus 19.2%; unadjusted mean difference, 16.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9-16.7]; adjusted mean difference, 15.6% [95% CI 14.9-16.2]). Mean hospital length of stay was longer for hospital-onset than for community-onset sepsis (47 days versus 30 days; unadjusted mean difference, 17 days [95% CI 16-17]; adjusted mean difference, 13 days [95% CI 12-14]).

conclusionPatients with hospital-onset sepsis admitted to critical care units in Japan had a poorer prognosis and more resource utilization including organ support rate, number of days with critical care unit surcharge codes, and hospital length of stay than those with community-onset sepsis.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsSepsisAdultCritical CareHospital MortalityHospitalsHumansJapanLength of StayRetrospective StudiesHospital length of stayIntensive care unitMortalityOrgan support therapyResource utilization

Identifiers

PMID35562773
PMCPMC9107171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.