Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562756›Full record

SynthesisChiropractic & manual therapies2022

Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain.

Morgan R Price, Zachary A Cupler, Cheryl Hawk, Edward M Bednarz, Sheryl A Walters, Clinton J Daniels

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral non-benzodiazepine muscle-relaxants for people with acute and chronic primary low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pain Medication in Chronic Low Back Pain.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Morgan R PriceVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA. Morgan.Price@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-6436
Zachary A CuplerButler VA Health Care System, Butler, PA, USA.
Cheryl HawkTexas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, TX, USA.
Edward M BednarzVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Sheryl A WaltersLogan University, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Clinton J DanielsVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Tacoma, WA, USA.
VA Puget Sound Health Care System · USLogan University · USTexas Chiropractic College · USVA Butler Healthcare · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify and descriptively compare medication recommendations among low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG).

methodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Index to Chiropractic Literature, AMED, CINAHL, and PEDro to identify CPGs that described the management of mechanical LBP in the prior five years. Two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts and potentially relevant full text were considered for eligibility. Four investigators independently applied the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument for critical appraisal. Data were extracted for pharmaceutical intervention, the strength of recommendation, and appropriateness for the duration of LBP.

results316 citations were identified, 50 full-text articles were assessed, and nine guidelines with global representation met the eligibility criteria. These CPGs addressed pharmacological treatments with or without non-pharmacological treatments. All CPGS focused on the management of acute, chronic, or unspecified duration of LBP. The mean overall AGREE II score was 89.3% (SD 3.5%). The lowest domain mean score was for applicability, 80.4% (SD 5.2%), and the highest was Scope and Purpose, 94.0% (SD 2.4%). There were ten classifications of medications described in the included CPGs: acetaminophen, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, oral corticosteroids, skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs), and atypical opioids.

conclusionsNine CPGs, included ten medication classes for the management of LBP. NSAIDs were the most frequently recommended medication for the treatment of both acute and chronic LBP as a first line pharmacological therapy. Acetaminophen and SMRs were inconsistently recommended for acute LBP. Meanwhile, with less consensus among CPGs, acetaminophen and antidepressants were proposed as second-choice therapies for chronic LBP. There was significant heterogeneity of recommendations within many medication classes, although oral corticosteroids, benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, and antibiotics were not recommended by any CPGs for acute or chronic LBP.

Indexed as

Low Back PainAcetaminophenAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzodiazepinesHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsAcetaminophenAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzodiazepinesPharmaceutical PreparationsClinical practice guidelineDrug therapyLow back painSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35562756
PMCPMC9101938
OpenAlexW4280523799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.