Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562711›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2022

Memantine for the patients with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: a pharmacological fMRI study.

Shoji Kawashima, RCIP-Nagoya Study Group, Noriyuki Matsukawa

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Parkinson's disease and glucose metabolism impairment.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Cognition and Activity of Daily Living Function in people with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shoji KawashimaDepartment of Neurology and Neuroscience, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan. shoji@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.
RCIP-Nagoya Study Group
Noriyuki MatsukawaDepartment of Neurology and Neuroscience, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPNagoya City University Hospital · JPHamamatsu University · JPOrthopedic Specialty Hospital · US

Funding

Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas 15K16362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD-MCI) is associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline. PD-MCI is characterized by impairments in executive function and visuospatial recognition. The visuospatial n-back test is useful for assessing both domains. The 0-back test reflects visuospatial recognition, while the 1-back and 2-back tests reflect working memory. Cholinesterase inhibitors are effective in the treatment of PD-MCI and dementia in PD (PDD). Although some studies have reported the efficacy of memantine for PDD, the therapeutic efficacy of memantine in patients with PD-MCI remains uncertain.

methodsThis study aimed to investigate the effects of memantine on brain function in patients with PD-MCI, using a randomized double-blinded crossover protocol and functional MRI (fMRI). Ten patients who completed 16 weeks of follow-up were included. They were randomly assigned to either the memantine or placebo. Patients in the memantine group received 5 mg/day of memantine in the first week. The memantine dose was increased by 5 mg/day per week, until a final dose of 20 mg/day. Patients in the placebo group received the placebo following the same regimen as memantine. After the intervention, they underwent a 4 weeks washout period. Following the crossover protocol, a second intervention was conducted after the washout period. In each intervention, fMRI and neuropsychological tests were performed at the maximum dose period. Comparing the memantine and placebo groups, we investigated difference in the brain regions using the visuospatial n-back test.

resultsThere were no significant regions enhanced by memantine comparing with placebo at any load of n-back tests. In contrast, exploring regions reduced by memantine, we found significant reduction of activations within right lingual gyrus and left superior frontal gyrus in comparison between 2-back and 0-back test. A number of correct answers of the 2-back test and time to complete Trail Making Test-A were worse during memantine intervention.

conclusionsMemantine did not improve visuospatial working memory of the patients with PD-MCI. Treatment for PD should be planned carefully considering the impact on cognitive function. Further study is needed to establish new therapeutic strategy.

trial registrationUMIN000046104. Retrospectively registered. First registration date: 28 Sept 2017.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionParkinson DiseaseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemantineNeuropsychological TestsMemantineDaytime sleepinessDementiaFunctional MRIMemantineMild cognitive impairmentN-back testParkinson’s diseaseSuperior frontal gyrusWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID35562711
PMCPMC9103297
OpenAlexW4280594706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.