Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562699›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Mechanisms of pelvic floor muscle training for managing urinary incontinence in women: a scoping review.

Ying Sheng, Janet S Carpenter, James A Ashton-Miller, Janis M Miller

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ying ShengIndiana University School of Nursing, 600 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. shengyin@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-3393
Janet S CarpenterIndiana University School of Nursing, 600 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
James A Ashton-MillerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, 2350 Hayward, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Janis M MillerDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Science, School of Nursing, 426 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
Development of 21st Century Concepts and Tools for Quantifying Urethral Failure Mechanisms that Cause Urinary IncontinenceRC2DK122379 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ASHTON-MILLER, JAMES ANTHONY, DELANCEY, JOHN O.L. · 2019 to 2024
$5.7M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Victoria Lee Champion, Catherine E Mosher · 2016 to 2026
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117865NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824NIDDK NIH HHS RC2 DK122379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic floor muscle training is recommended as first line treatment for urinary incontinence in women based on three proposed theorized mechanisms: 'Enhanced Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength,' 'Maximized Awareness of Timing,' and 'Strengthened Core Muscles'. The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically map evidence for and against theorized mechanisms through which pelvic floor muscle training interventions work to reduce urinary incontinence in women.

methodsThe scoping review is based upon a comprehensive search of relevant literature published from 1990 to 2020 in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ClinialTrials.gov, reference lists from review articles, and hand searches of articles by known researchers in the field. We included English-language, peer-reviewed articles on pelvic floor muscle training as an intervention for adult women if they provided empirical evidence to testing the theorized intervention mechanisms. Two independent reviewers screened articles for inclusion and extracted data to describe details of each study (author, year, country, design, sampling), measures of pelvic floor muscle strength and urinary incontinence, statistical analysis of linkage between changes in the measures, and pelvic floor muscle training regimens. Data were summarized to facilitate the integration of diverse evidence to draw conclusions on supporting or refuting the three proposed theorized mechanisms for managing urinary incontinence in women.

resultsOf the 278 articles identified with the search, 13 (4.7%) met inclusion criteria. There was weak to no evidence for the mechanism of enhanced pelvic floor muscle strength, equivocal support for maximized awareness of timing, and no evidence for strengthened core muscles.

conclusionsThis review revealed extremely limited data supporting the proposed theorized mechanisms underlying pelvic floor muscle training programs to manage urinary incontinence in women. Such evidence is needed to help women and clinicians understand how, why and when a woman benefits from pelvic floor muscle training. Future studies should specifically state and report statistical analysis that relates the theorized mechanisms to the training outcomes observed.

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressAdultExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPelvic FloorKegelKnack skillPelvic muscle exercisesPhysical therapyTransversus abdominisUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID35562699
PMCPMC9103460
OpenAlexW4280641337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.