Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562648›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2022

Quality of breeding value predictions from longitudinal analyses, with application to residual feed intake in pigs.

Ingrid David, Anne Ricard, Van-Hung Huynh-Tran, Jack C M Dekkers, Hélène Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ingrid DavidGenPhySE, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, INPT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, France. ingrid.david@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-6693
Anne RicardUniversité Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78352, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Van-Hung Huynh-TranGenPhySE, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, INPT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, France.
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Hélène GilbertGenPhySE, INRAE, Université de Toulouse, INPT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, France.

Funding

Horizon 2020 EU 633531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important goal in animal breeding is to improve longitudinal traits. The objective of this study was to explore for longitudinal residual feed intake (RFI) data, which estimated breeding value (EBV), or combination of EBV, to use in a breeding program. Linear combinations of EBV (summarized breeding values, SBV) or phenotypes (summarized phenotypes) derived from the eigenvectors of the genetic covariance matrix over time were considered, and the linear regression method (LR method) was used to facilitate the evaluation of their prediction accuracy.

resultsWeekly feed intake, average daily gain, metabolic body weight, and backfat thickness measured on 2435 growing French Large White pigs over a 10-week period were analysed using a random regression model. In this population, the 544 dams of the phenotyped animals were genotyped. These dams did not have own phenotypes. The quality of the predictions of SBV and breeding values from summarized phenotypes of these females was evaluated. On average, predictions of SBV at the time of selection were unbiased, slightly over-dispersed and less accurate than those obtained with additional phenotypic information. The use of genomic information did not improve the quality of predictions. The use of summarized instead of longitudinal phenotypes resulted in predictions of breeding values of similar quality.

conclusionsFor practical selection on longitudinal data, the results obtained with this specific design suggest that the use of summarized phenotypes could facilitate routine genetic evaluation of longitudinal traits.

Indexed as

EatingGenomeAnimal FeedAnimalsBody WeightFemaleGenomicsPhenotypeSwine

Identifiers

PMID35562648
PMCPMC9103455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.