ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Automated Label Extraction from Clinical Reports Accurately Classifies 3D MRI Brain Volumes.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large language model-based uncertainty-adjusted label extraction for artificial intelligence model development in upper extremity radiography.European radiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing chest X-ray datasets with privacy-preserving large language models and multi-type annotations: A data-driven approach for improved classification.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Strategies AI Addresses Multiple Technical Challenges in Deep Learning Deployment: Proof-of-Principle Demonstration for Neuroblastoma Brain Metastasis Detection.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Direct Evaluation of Treatment Response in Brain Metastatic Disease with Deep Neuroevolution.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Reinforcement learning in medical image analysis: Concepts, applications, challenges, and future directions.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Image classification is probably the most fundamental task in radiology artificial intelligence. To reduce the burden of acquiring and labeling data sets, we employed a two-pronged strategy. We automatically extracted labels from radiology reports in Part 1. In Part 2, we used the labels to train a data-efficient reinforcement learning (RL) classifier. We applied the approach to a small set of patient images and radiology reports from our institution. For Part 1, we trained sentence-BERT (SBERT) on 90 radiology reports. In Part 2, we used the labels from the trained SBERT to train an RL-based classifier. We trained the classifier on a training set of [Formula: see text] images. We tested on a separate collection of [Formula: see text] images. For comparison, we also trained and tested a supervised deep learning (SDL) classification network on the same set of training and testing images using the same labels. Part 1: The trained SBERT model improved from 82 to [Formula: see text] accuracy. Part 2: Using Part 1's computed labels, SDL quickly overfitted the small training set. Whereas SDL showed the worst possible testing set accuracy of 50%, RL achieved [Formula: see text] testing set accuracy, with a [Formula: see text]-value of [Formula: see text]. We have shown the proof-of-principle application of automated label extraction from radiological reports. Additionally, we have built on prior work applying RL to classification using these labels, extending from 2D slices to entire 3D image volumes. RL has again demonstrated a remarkable ability to train effectively, in a generalized manner, and based on small training sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.