Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562551›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2023

Visual outcomes and predictors in optic pathway glioma: a single centre study.

R Bowman, B Walters, V Smith, K L Prise, S E Handley, K Green, K Mankad, P O'Hare, C Dahl, M Jorgensen and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Complications and visual outcomes following surgical resection of pediatric optic pathway/hypothalamic gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R BowmanGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England. richardbowman493@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5422-4104
B WaltersGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
V SmithGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
K L PriseGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
S E HandleyGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
K GreenGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.ORCID 0000-0002-5911-0541
K MankadGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
P O'HareGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
C DahlGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
M JorgensenGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
E OpocherGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
D HargraveGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
D A ThompsonGreat Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, WC1N 3JH, London, England.
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsOptic pathway gliomas (OPGs) may cause progressive visual loss despite chemotherapy. Newer, less toxic treatments might be given earlier, depending on visual prognosis. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of visual evoked potentials (VEP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

methodsA retrospective study of OPG patients (treated 2003-2017) was conducted. Primary outcome was PEDIG category visual acuity in better and worse eyes (good < = 0.2, moderate 0.3-0.6 and poor > = 0.7 logMAR). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of these outcomes.

results60 patients (32 Neurofibromatosis type 1 [NF1] and 28 sporadic) had median presentation age 49 months (range 17-183) (NF1) and 27 months (range 4-92) (sporadic). Median follow up was 82 months (range 12-189 months). At follow up 24/32 (75%) of NF1 children and 14/28 (50%) of sporadic children had good better eye visual acuity and 11/32 (34%) of NF1 children and 15/28 (54%) of sporadics had poor worse eye acuity. Mean peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness predicted good better eye final acuity (OR 0.799, 95%CI 0.646-0.987, p = 0.038). Presenting with visual symptoms (OR 0.22 95% CI 0.001-0.508, p = 0.017) and poorer VEP scores (OR 2.35 95% CI 1.1-5.03, p = 0.027) predicted poor worse eye final acuity. 16 children had homonymous hemianopias at follow up, predicted by poor presenting binocular VEP score (OR 1.449 95%CI 1.052-1.995, p = 0.02).

conclusionsWe found that both RNFL thickness on OCT and VEP were useful in predicting future visual acuity and vision and potentially in planning treatment. We had a high prevalence of homonymous hemianopia.

Indexed as

Neurofibromatosis 1Optic Nerve GliomaChildEvoked Potentials, VisualHemianopsiaHumansRetinaRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID35562551
PMCPMC10101957
OpenAlexW4280591672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.