Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562414›Full record

SynthesisJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2022

Predicting clinical outcomes using artificial intelligence and machine learning in neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review.

Ryan M McAdams, Ravneet Kaur, Yao Sun, Harlieen Bindra, Su Jin Cho, Harpreet Singh

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. [Recent advances in artificial intelligence for auxiliary diagnosis and management of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Development of a machine learning model for prediction of intraventricular hemorrhage in premature neonates.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryan M McAdams *Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9579-1698
Ravneet Kaur *Child Health Imprints (CHIL) USA Inc, Madison, WI, USA.
Yao SunDivision of Neonatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Harlieen BindraChild Health Imprints (CHIL) USA Inc, Madison, WI, USA.
Su Jin ChoCollege of Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3851-9073
Harpreet SinghChild Health Imprints (CHIL) USA Inc, Madison, WI, USA. harpreet@childhealthimprints.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9104-6060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in technology, data availability, and analytics have helped improve quality of care in the neonatal intensive care unit.

objectiveTo provide an in-depth review of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning techniques being utilized to predict neonatal outcomes.

methodsThe PRISMA protocol was followed that considered articles from established digital repositories. Included articles were categorized based on predictions of: (a) major neonatal morbidities such as sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and retinopathy of prematurity; (b) mortality; and (c) length of stay.

resultsA total of 366 studies were considered; 68 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. The current set of predictor models are primarily built on supervised learning and mostly used regression models built on retrospective data.

conclusionWith the availability of EMR data and data-sharing of NICU outcomes across neonatal research networks, machine learning algorithms have shown breakthrough performance in predicting neonatal disease.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingIntensive Care Units, NeonatalArtificial IntelligenceHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.