Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562372›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2022

Immunogenicity and safety of an intradermal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 boost in a healthy population.

Nawamin Pinpathomrat, Porntip Intapiboon, Purilap Seepathomnarong, Jomkwan Ongarj, Ratchanon Sophonmanee, Jariya Hengprakop, Smonrapat Surasombatpattana, Supattra Uppanisakorn, Surakameth Mahasirimongkol, Waritta Sawaengdee and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nawamin PinpathomratDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0776-595X
Porntip IntapiboonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-3963
Purilap SeepathomnarongDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Jomkwan OngarjDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Ratchanon SophonmaneeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Jariya HengprakopDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Smonrapat SurasombatpattanaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Supattra UppanisakornClinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Surakameth MahasirimongkolDepartment of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Waritta SawaengdeeDepartment of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Supaporn PhumiamornInstitute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Sompong SapsutthipasInstitute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Chanon KongkamolDivision of Digital Innovation and Data Analytics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Thammasin IngviyaDivision of Digital Innovation and Data Analytics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Pasuree SangsupawanichClinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Sarunyou ChusriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. sarunyouchusri@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3116-2518
Prince of Songkla University · THMinistry of Public Health · TH

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University (Faculty of Medicine, PSU) REC.64-368-4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic. Two doses of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) have been shown to be insufficient to protect against variants of concern (VOCs), while viral vector vaccines remain protective against the infection. Herein, we conducted a preliminary study to evaluate the safety and immunity in an adult population who received the conventional 2 dosage-regimen of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; with an additional intradermal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 reciprocal dosage (1:5). An Intramuscular ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 booster was also included as a control. Immediate and delayed local reactions were frequently observed in the fractional intradermal boost, but systemic side effects were significantly decreased compared to the conventional intramuscular boost. The anti-RBD-IgG levels, the neutralising function against delta variants, and T cell responses were significantly increased after boosting via both routes. Interestingly, the shorter interval elicited higher immunogenicity compared to the extended interval. Taken together, a reciprocal dosage of intradermal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 booster reduces systemic adverse reactions and enhances non inferiority humoral and cellular immune responses compared to a full dose of intramuscular boosting. These findings provide for an effective vaccine management during the shortages of vaccine supply.

Identifiers

PMID35562372
PMCPMC9106663
OpenAlexW4280635362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.