ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2022
Predicting hospitalisation for heart failure and death in patients with, or at risk of, heart failure before first hospitalisation: a retrospective model development and external validation study.
Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of telemedical management on hospitalization and mortality in heart failure patients with diabetes: a post-hoc subgroup analysis of the TIM-HF2 trial.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Trial
- Cardiac dysfunction after acute ischaemic stroke: Long-term outcomes from the SICFAIL cohort.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Reappraising cardiac function with myocardial contraction fraction: normal values, disease detection, and prognostication.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2026Article
- Growth Differentiation Factor-15 as an Emerging Biomarker in Cardiology: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Prediction of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations and mortality using the echocardiographic Killip score.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Imaging-Free Myocardial Fibrosis Prediction Models, Association with Outcomes, and Sample Size Estimation for Phase 3 Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Multimodal deep learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients using longitudinal chest X-rays and electronic health records.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Predicting appropriateness of antibiotic treatment among ICU patients with hospital-acquired infection.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring Mortality and Prognostic Factors of Heart Failure with In-Hospital and Emergency Patients by Electronic Medical Records: A Machine Learning Approach.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- External Validation and Update of the Risk Prediction Model for Denosumab-Induced Hypocalcemia Developed From a Hospital-Based Administrative Database.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Identification of heart failure hospitalization from NHS Digital data: comparison with expert adjudication.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Article
- Growth differentiation factor-15 in patients with or at risk of heart failure but before first hospitalisation.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2024Article
- Proteomic prediction of incident heart failure and its main subtypes.European journal of heart failure · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence based real-time prediction of imminent heart failure hospitalisation in patients undergoing non-invasive telemedicine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Early detection of heart failure using in-patient longitudinal electronic health records.PloS one · 2024Article
- Risk stratification in patients with structurally normal hearts: Does fibrosis type matter?PloS one · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a multivariate model for predicting heart failure hospitalization and mortality in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.Renal failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying people who are at risk of being admitted to hospital (hospitalised) for heart failure and death, and particularly those who have not previously been hospitalised for heart failure, is a priority. We aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model involving contemporary deep phenotyping that can be used to generate individual risk estimates of hospitalisation for heart failure or all-cause mortality in patients with, or at risk of, heart failure, but who have not previously been hospitalised for heart failure.
methodsBetween June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018, 3019 consecutive adult patients (aged ≥16 years) undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK, were prospectively recruited into a model development cohort. Candidate predictor variables were selected according to clinical practice and literature review. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to develop a prognostic model. The final model was validated in an external cohort of 1242 consecutive adult patients undergoing CMR at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, between June 1, 2010, and March 25, 2016. Exclusion criteria for both cohorts included previous hospitalisation for heart failure. Our study outcome was a composite of first hospitalisation for heart failure or all-cause mortality after CMR. Model performance was evaluated in both cohorts by discrimination (Harrell's C-index) and calibration (assessed graphically).
findingsMedian follow-up durations were 1118 days (IQR 950-1324) for the development cohort and 2117 days (1685-2446) for the validation cohort. The composite outcome occurred in 225 (7·5%) of 3019 patients in the development cohort and in 219 (17·6%) of 1242 patients in the validation cohort. The final, externally validated, parsimonious, multivariable model comprised the predictors: age, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and the CMR variables, global longitudinal strain, myocardial infarction, and myocardial extracellular volume. The median optimism-adjusted C-index for the externally validated model across 20 imputed model development datasets was 0·805 (95% CI 0·793-0·829) in the development cohort and 0·793 (0·766-0·820) in the external validation cohort. Model calibration was excellent across the full risk profile. A risk calculator that provides an estimated risk of hospitalisation for heart failure or all-cause mortality at 3 years after CMR for individual patients was generated.
interpretationWe developed and externally validated a risk prediction model that provides accurate, individualised estimates of the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and all-cause mortality in patients with, or at risk of, heart failure, before first hospitalisation. It could be used to direct intensified therapy and closer follow-up to those at increased risk.
fundingThe UK National Institute for Health Research, Guerbet Laboratories, and Roche Diagnostics International.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.