Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35562124›Full record

ArticleThe American surgeon2023

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediction of Surgical Complications: Current State, Applications, and Implications.

Abbas M Hassan, Aashish Rajesh, Malke Asaad, Jonas A Nelson, J Henk Coert, Babak J Mehrara, Charles E Butler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American surgeon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Development and comparison of machine learning models for predicting postoperative ileus after posterior thoracolumbar fracture surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Artificial intelligence in surgical planning and outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnea: emerging hype or the future standard?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Abbas M HassanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 571198The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Aashish RajeshDepartment of Surgery, 14742University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Malke AsaadDepartment of Plastic Surgery, 6595University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jonas A NelsonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 5803Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Henk CoertDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 8124University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Babak J MehraraDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 5803Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Charles E ButlerDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 571198The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical complications pose significant challenges for surgeons, patients, and health care systems as they may result in patient distress, suboptimal outcomes, and higher health care costs. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven models have revolutionized the field of surgery by accurately identifying patients at high risk of developing surgical complications and by overcoming several limitations associated with traditional statistics-based risk calculators. This article aims to provide an overview of AI in predicting surgical complications using common machine learning and deep learning algorithms and illustrates how this can be utilized to risk stratify patients preoperatively. This can form the basis for discussions on informed consent based on individualized patient factors in the future.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSurgeonsAlgorithmsDelivery of Health CareHumansMachine Learningartificial intelligencecalculatordeep learningmachine learningrisk assessmentsurgical complications

Identifiers

PMID35562124
PMCPMC9653510
OpenAlexW4280505635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.