ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023
[Cognitive and Non-Cognitive, Doctor-Relevant Competencies for the Selection of Prospective Country Doctors in Bavaria: Corona-Compliant Selection Process Across Institutes].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Strengthening the Role of Public Health Service: a Comparison of the Public Health Service Quota Selection Procedures in Germany].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe challenge is to counteract the undersupply of doctors in rural areas in Bavaria. As one possibility, the "Country Doctor Quota" measure provides for the allocation of dedicated medical study places for prospective specialists with general practice activities. A specific selection process for future medical students was established and safely implemented under the safety and hygiene conditions of the corona pandemic.
methodIn Bavaria, a two-stage selection process was developed and used in full for the first time in 2021 for the selection of students. Due to the corona pandemic, only the results of stage 1 of the process for the selection of prospective students were taken into account in the previous year. Cognitive and non-cognitive criteria were included in a 2-stage selection process. In the second stage, physician-relevant competencies (e. g. resilience, problem-solving ability, empathy and compassion, communication skills, ethical decision-making, as well as consulting and social skills) were assessed by Bavarian family doctors in four multiple mini interviews and a 10-minute, semi-structured individual interview. A maximum of 100 points could be achieved. A digital, contact-free selection process was established and successfully implemented to ensure protection and hygiene conditions in the context of the interviews.
resultsA total of 436 people applied as part of the Bavarian country doctor quota for the 2021/2022 winter semester; 226 applicants were invited to the selection interviews at the second stage, of which 115 applicants received a place at the university. 64% of the participants had already completed medical vocational training, the high school graduation grade average was 2.4.
conclusionThe developed selection process identified applicants as part of the Bavarian country doctor quota and selected using objective criteria. All available medical study places were filled with the 115 finally selected applicants. To what extent the selected applicants (can) counteract the impending shortage of prospective specialists with general practitioner work remains to be seen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.