ArticleJournal of affective disorders2022
Construct validity and factor structure of the K-10 among Ugandan adults.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Consistency as the Currency in Psychological Measures: A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10 and K-6).Depression and anxiety · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of CHANGE, a non-specialist worker delivered intervention to address alcohol use disorders and psychological distress among conflict-affected populations in Uganda: a qualitative study.Journal of migration and health · 2025Article
- Assessing the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization -five well-being index (WHO-5) in Filipino samples amid the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- Psychological distress among family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in Uganda.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Cross-cultural equivalence of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) across four African countries in a multi-national study of adults.SSM. Mental health · 2024Article
- Psychological distress and PTSD among clinicians in Roma, Lesotho during the COVID-19 pandemic.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024Article
- Validity of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale in Brazilian higher education students.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychological distress is often used as a proxy measure for the mental health of a population. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10) is a widely used brief screening tool for psychological distress, yet few studies have evaluated its utility in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated its construct validity and factor structure in Uganda.
methodsWe used data from an ongoing case-control study. Participants in the present study were patients seeking general medical outpatient services and caretakers of mentally ill persons. Demographic data were collected using a structured questionnaire, and psychological distress was assessed using the K-10. K-10 construct validity and factorial structure were assessed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
resultsA total of 2104 participants were included in this analysis, these were controls from a general medical setting. The mean K-10 score was 2.34 with an internal consistency of 0.86. EFA resulted in a two-factor solution that accounted for 78.37% of the variance. CFA revealed that a unidimensional model of psychological distress with correlated errors between some of K-10 items was superior, with a comparative fit index of 0.95, Tucker-Lewis index of 0.93, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.08. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited to evaluating internal consistency and construct validity. Future studies are warranted to examine criterion validity and establish cut-offs for psychological distress.
conclusionsThe K-10 had good psychometric properties in this population and may be useful for measuring broad psychological distress in general medical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.