ArticleComputational biology and chemistry2022
A new approach for determining SARS-CoV-2 epitopes using machine learning-based in silico methods.
Article in Computational biology and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use and Importance ofArtificial Intelligence in Vaccine Research, Development, and Production.Archives of Razi Institute · 2025Review
- Clinically interpretable multiclass neural network for discriminating cardiac diseases.Heliyon · 2025Article
- In silico design of Ebola virus Glycoprotein antigenic peptides as vaccine candidates.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Hybrid Predictive Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Immunodominant Peptides of Respiratory Syncytial Virus.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Prediction of antigenic peptides of SARS- CoV-2 pathogen using machine learning.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Mutual Information and Feature Selection for SARS-CoV-2 Respiratory Infection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detection of Monkeypox Cases Based on Symptoms Using XGBoost and Shapley Additive Explanations Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Prediction of Acid-Base and Potassium Imbalances in Intensive Care Patients Using Machine Learning Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of machine learning-based in silico tools has enabled rapid and high-quality predictions in the biomedical field. In the COVID-19 pandemic, machine learning methods have been used in many topics such as predicting the death of patients, modeling the spread of infection, determining future effects, diagnosis with medical image analysis, and forecasting the vaccination rate. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding identifying epitopes that can be used in fast, useful, and effective vaccine design using machine learning methods and bioinformatics tools. Machine learning methods can give medical biotechnologists an advantage in designing a faster and more successful vaccine. The motivation of this study is to propose a successful hybrid machine learning method for SARS-CoV-2 epitope prediction and to identify nonallergen, nontoxic, antigen peptides that can be used in vaccine design from the predicted epitopes with bioinformatics tools. The identified epitopes will be effective not only in the design of the COVID-19 vaccine but also against viruses from the SARS family that may be encountered in the future. For this purpose, epitope prediction performances of random forest, support vector machine, logistic regression, bagging with decision tree, k-nearest neighbor and decision tree methods were examined. In the SARS-CoV and B-cell datasets used for education in the study, epitope estimation was performed again after the datasets were balanced with the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) method since the epitope class samples were in the minority compared to the nonepitope class. The experimental results obtained were compared and the most successful predictions were obtained with the random forest (RF) method. The epitope prediction performance in balanced datasets was found to be higher than that in the original datasets (94.0% AUC and 94.4% PRC for the SMOTE-SARS-CoV dataset; 95.6% AUC and 95.3% PRC for the SMOTE-B-cell dataset). In this study, 252 peptides out of 20312 peptides were determined to be epitopes with the SMOTE-RF-SVM hybrid method proposed for SARS-CoV-2 epitope prediction. Determined epitopes were analyzed with AllerTOP 2.0, VaxiJen 2.0 and ToxinPred tools, and allergic, nonantigen, and toxic epitopes were eliminated. As a result, 11 possible nonallergic, high antigen and nontoxic epitope candidates were proposed that could be used in protein-based COVID-19 vaccine design ("VGGNYNY", "VNFNFNGLTG", "RQIAPGQTGKI", "QIAPGQTGKIA", "SYECDIPIGAGI", "STFKCYGVSPTKL", "GVVFLHVTYVPAQ", "KNHTSPDVDLGDI", "NHTSPDVDLGDIS", "AGAAAYYVGYLQPR", "KKSTNLVKNKCVNF"). It is predicted that the few epitopes determined by machine learning-based in silico methods will help biotechnologists design fast and accurate vaccines by reducing the number of trials in the laboratory environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.