Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35561276›Full record

Observational studyHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2022

Safety of intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination in patients with haemophilia.

Andreas Tiede, Hendrik Leise, Silvia Horneff, Johannes Oldenburg, Susan Halimeh, Christine Heller, Christoph Königs, Katharina Holstein, Christian Pfrepper

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Treatment of haemophilia in Austria].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Safety of intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination in patients with haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas TiedeDepartment of Haematology, Haemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-8536
Hendrik LeiseDepartment of Haematology, Haemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Silvia HorneffInstitute for Experimental Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Johannes OldenburgInstitute for Experimental Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3038-2145
Susan HalimehHaemostasis Centre, Duisburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-9870
Christine HellerClinical and Molecular Haemostasis, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christoph KönigsClinical and Molecular Haemostasis, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Katharina HolsteinUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian PfrepperDivision of Haemostaseology, Medical Department I, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-7402
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEBG Klinikum Duisburg · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend that patients with haemophilia should preferably receive vaccination subcutaneously. COVID-19 and other vaccines, however, are only licenced for intramuscular application.

aimsTo assess the safety of intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination in patients living with haemophilia.

methodsPart A of this prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients with haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) of all ages and severities and assessed injection site bleeding and other complications within 30 days of vaccination. Part B enrolled patients providing informed consent for detailed data collection including medication and prophylaxis around the time of vaccination. Logistic regression was performed to assess potential risk factors for bleeding.

resultsFour hundred and sixty-one patients were enrolled into part A. The primary endpoint injection site bleeding occurred in seven patients (1.5%, 95% confidence interval .7-3.1%). Comprehensive analysis of 214 patients (404 vaccinations, part B) revealed that 97% of patients with severe haemophilia had prophylaxis before vaccination, either as part of their routine prophylaxis or using additional doses. 56% and 30% of patients with moderate and mild haemophilia, respectively, received prophylaxis before vaccination. Among the seven bleeds recorded, three occurred when intramuscular vaccination was done without prophylaxis (odds ratio 12).

conclusionsThis is the first prospective study reporting on the safety of intramuscular vaccination in haemophilia. The rate of injection site bleeding was low in mild haemophilia, and in moderate and severe haemophilia if patients received factor prophylaxis.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHemophilia AFactor VIIIHemorrhageHumansProspective StudiesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesFactor VIIIblood coagulation disordersCOVID-19 vaccinesemicizumabFactor IXFactor VIIIhumansobservational study

Identifiers

PMID35561276
PMCPMC9348084
OpenAlexW4280493369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.