Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35561077›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Combined proton-photon therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Florian Amstutz, Silvia Fabiano, Louise Marc, Damien Charles Weber, Antony John Lomax, Jan Unkelbach, Ye Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Florian AmstutzCenter for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-8093
Silvia FabianoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Louise MarcDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Damien Charles WeberCenter for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Antony John LomaxCenter for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Jan UnkelbachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ye ZhangCenter for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-4467
Paul Scherrer Institute · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

Swiss Cancer Research Foundation KFS-4528-08-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdvanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still a challenging indication for conventional photon radiotherapy. Proton therapy has the potential to improve outcomes, but proton treatment slots remain a limited resource despite an increasing number of proton therapy facilities. This work investigates the potential benefits of optimally combined proton-photon therapy delivered using a fixed horizontal proton beam line in combination with a photon Linac, which could increase accessibility to proton therapy for such a patient cohort. MATERIALS AND

methodsA treatment planning study has been conducted on a patient cohort of seven advanced NSCLC patients. Each patient had a planning computed tomography scan (CT) and multiple repeated CTs from three different days and for different breath-holds on each day. Treatment plans for combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT) were calculated for individual patients by optimizing the combined cumulative dose on the initial planning CT only (non-adapted) as well as on each daily CT respectively (adapted). The impact of inter-fractional changes and/or breath-hold variability was then assessed on the repeat breath-hold CTs. Results were compared to plans for IMRT or IMPT alone, as well as against combined treatments assuming a proton gantry. Plan quality was assessed in terms of dosimetric, robustness and NTCP metrics.

resultsCombined treatment plans improved plan quality compared to IMRT treatments, especially in regard to reductions of low and medium doses to organs at risk (OARs), which translated into lower NTCP estimates for three side effects. For most patients, combined treatments achieved results close to IMPT-only plans. Inter-fractional changes impact mainly the target coverage of combined and IMPT treatments, while OARs doses were less affected by these changes. With plan adaptation however, target coverage of combined treatments remained high even when taking variability between breath-holds into account.

conclusionsOptimally combined proton-photon plans improve treatment plan quality compared to IMRT only, potentially reducing the risk of toxicity while also allowing to potentially increase accessibility to proton therapy for NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsProton TherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansOrgans at RiskProtonsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedProtonscombined proton-photon therapylung cancerphoton therapyproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID35561077
PMCPMC9544482
OpenAlexW4280506529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.