Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35560294›Full record

ArticleNanoImpact2022

Towards health-based nano reference values (HNRVs) for occupational exposure: Recommendations from an expert panel.

Maaike Visser, Ilse Gosens, Delphine Bard, Pieter van Broekhuizen, Gemma Janer, Eileen Kuempel, Michael Riediker, Ulla Vogel, Susan Dekkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NanoImpact, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maaike VisserNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Maaike.visser@rivm.nl.
Ilse GosensNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Delphine BardHealth and Safety Executive (HSE) Science and Research Centre, Buxton, United Kingdom.
Pieter van BroekhuizenUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gemma JanerLeitat Technological Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Eileen KuempelNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Michael RiedikerSwiss Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Ulla VogelNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susan DekkersNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unique physicochemical characteristics of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) suggest the need for nanomaterial-specific occupational exposure limits (OELs). Setting these limits remains a challenge. Therefore, the aim of this study was to set out a framework to evaluate the feasibility of deriving advisory health-based occupational limit values for groups of ENMs, based on scientific knowledge. We have used an expert panel approach to address three questions: 1) What ENM-categories should be distinguished to derive advisory health-based occupational limit values (or health-based Nano Reference Values, HNRVs) for groups of ENMs? 2) What evidence would be needed to define values for these categories? And 3) How much effort would it take to achieve this? The panel experts distinguished six possible categories of HNRVs: A) WHO-fiber-like high aspect ratio ENMs (HARNs), B) Non-WHO-fiber-like HARNs and other non-spheroidal ENMs, C) readily soluble spheroidal ENMs, D) biopersistent spheroidal ENMs with unknown toxicity, E) biopersistent spheroidal ENMs with substance-specific toxicity and F) biopersistent spheroidal ENMs with relatively low substance-specific toxicity. For category A, the WHO-fiber-like HARNs, agreement was reached on criteria defining this category and the approach of using health-based risk estimates for asbestos to derive the HNRV. For category B, a quite heterogeneous category, more toxicity data are needed to set an HNRV. For category C, readily soluble spheroidal ENMs, using the OEL of their molecular or ionic counterpart would be a good starting point. For the biopersistent ENMs with unknown toxicity, HNRVs cannot be applied as case-by-case testing is required. For the other biopersistent ENMs in category E and F, we make several recommendations that can facilitate the derivation of these HNRVs. The proposed categories and recommendations as outlined by this expert panel can serve as a reference point for derivation of HNRVs when health-based OELs for ENMs are not yet available.

Indexed as

NanostructuresOccupational ExposureIonsIonsEngineered nanomaterialsExpert panelHealth basedNano reference valuesOccupational exposure limit

Identifiers

PMID35560294
PMCPMC10617652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.