Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35560212›Full record

ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2022

A taxonomy of occupational and organisational stressors and protectors of mental health reported by veterinary professionals in Australasia.

C E Connolly, K Norris, A Martin, S Dawkins, C Meehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An examination of veterinarians' negotiation of emotional labor.Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C E ConnollySchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0254-0265
K NorrisSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
A MartinMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
S DawkinsSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
C MeehanSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop a taxonomy of positive and negative occupational and organisational factors reported that impact the mental health of veterinary professionals.

methodsVeterinary professionals working in Australasia were surveyed between February and June of 2021. The survey comprised two questions related to participants' perceptions of the positive and negative aspects of their job role that impact their mental health and wellbeing. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to analyse the responses and generate two taxonomies of occupational and organisation stressors and protectors reported by participants.

resultsFifty-three responses from veterinary professionals were analysed. The final stressor taxonomy generated contained 9 overarching themes and 36 subthemes. The most common of these were negative work conditions, challenging relationships with clients, and adverse events and patient outcomes. The taxonomy of protectors contained 11 overarching themes and 32 subthemes, with the most common including fulfillment and satisfaction, positive work conditions, and relationships with colleagues.

conclusionThis study is the first to examine both positive and negative factors in the veterinary industry reported by veterinary professionals in Australasia. The results highlighted stressors that can be addressed on both an individual and organisational level to promote the mental and health well-being of professionals working in the animal care industry.

Indexed as

Mental HealthVeterinariansAnimalsAustralasiaHumansJob SatisfactionSurveys and Questionnairesoccupational mental healthpositive psychologyqualitative studyreflexive thematic analysisveterinary industryveterinary professionalswellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35560212
PMCPMC9544948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.