ArticlePloS one2022
Estimation of gait parameters using leg velocity for amputee population.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing spinal reflexes evoked by sensory spinal cord stimulation in people with lower-limb amputation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- The reciprocal relationship between gait and handgrip strength across different age groups.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Rules-Based Real-Time Gait Event Detection Algorithm for Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users during Level-Ground and Ramp Walking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Estimation of Gait Parameters for Transfemoral Amputees Using Lower Limb Kinematics and Deterministic Algorithms.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantification of key gait parameters plays an important role in assessing gait deficits in clinical research. Gait parameter estimation using lower-limb kinematics (mainly leg velocity data) has shown promise but lacks validation for the amputee population. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of lower-leg angular velocity to predict key gait events (toe-off and heel strike) and associated temporal parameters for the amputee population. An open data set of reflexive markers during treadmill walking from 10 subjects with unilateral transfemoral amputation was used. A rule-based dual-minima algorithm was developed to detect the landmarks in the shank velocity signal indicating toe-off and heel strike events. Four temporal gait parameters were also estimated (step time, stride time, stance and swing duration). These predictions were compared against the force platform data for 3000 walking cycles from 239 walking trials. Considerable accuracy was achieved for the HS event as well as for step and stride timings, with mean errors ranging from 0 to -13ms. The TO prediction exhibited a larger error with its mean ranging from 35-81ms. The algorithm consistently predicted the TO earlier than the actual event, resulting in prediction errors in stance and swing timings. Significant differences were found between the prediction for sound and prosthetic legs, with better TO accuracy on the prosthetic side. The prediction accuracy also appeared to improve with the subjects' mobility level (K-level). In conclusion, the leg velocity profile, coupled with the dual-minima algorithm, can predict temporal parameters for the transfemoral amputee population with varying degrees of accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.