ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural endoscopic surgery and transumbilical single port laparoscopy surgery for endometrial cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypoxia-induced m6A demethylase ALKBH5 promotes ovarian cancer tumorigenicity by decreasing methylation of the lncRNA RMRP.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Single-port laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspensionFrontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the difference in clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal and transumbilical single port laparoscopy for endometrial cancer.
methodsWe retrospectively included 100 endometrial cancer patients who were admitted to the Fuzhou Second Hospital for surgical treatment from September 2020 to September 2021 and divided them into two groups according to different surgical treatment options. Patients in Group A (48 cases) were treated with transvaginal natural endoscopic surgery (TNES), and those in Group B (52 cases) were with transumbilical single port laparoscopic surgery (TSPLS). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative exhaust, length of hospital stay, pelvic lymph node dissection, and incision infection rate of two groups were compared. The white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct) of the two groups of patients before and after the surgery were compared between the two groups, as well as th VAS score of 24 hours after the operation, rate of complications during hospitalization, satisfaction with surgery and quality of life 3 months after surgery.
resultsCompared with Group B, the operation time and intraoperative blood loss of Group A patients were markedly increased. The time to postoperative exhaust, length of hospital stay, incision infection rate, VAS score at postoperative 24 h, and complication rate of Group A were significantly lower than that of Group B. In addition, Group A had higher performance on the number of pelvic lymph node dissections, surgical satisfaction and quality of life 3 months after surgery.
conclusionTransvaginal natural cavity endoscopy had better surgical results with faster postoperative recovery and higher safety compared with TSPLS, making it valuable in clinical application and worthy of further popularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35559407PMC9091124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.