ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Analysis of perioperative complications and related risk factors of thoracotomy and complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unexplained intraoperative cardiac tamponade during thoracoscopic lobectomy: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Analysis of risk factors and management of unexpected intraoperative bleeding during video-assisted thoracic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a case-control study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the perioperative complications and related risk factors of thoracotomy and complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (c-VATS) lobectomy.
methodsA total of 93 patients with early lung cancer (LC) treated in our hospital from Mar. 2017 to Mar. 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Among them, 45 patients underwent conventional thoracotomy lobectomy was classified as the control group (Con group, n=45) and other 48 patients underwent c-VATS lobectomy was classified as the observation group (Obs group, n=48). Surgical indicators of the two groups were compared, and the changes of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), and pulmonary function indexes were compared before and after operation. Additionally, postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to analyse the independent risk factors for postoperative complications.
resultsThe Obs group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss than the Con group and experienced significantly shorter operation time than the Con group (both P<0.001). The Obs group had significantly lower VAS scores than the Con group at 1 day and 7 days after surgery (P<0.05), and showed significantly lower levels of plasma IL-6 and VEGF than the Con group (both P<0.001). In addition, higher forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximum ventilation per minute (MVV) were found in the Obs group than in the Con group (P<0.001), and the Obs group showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications than the Con group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, body mass index (BMI) and operation mode were independent risk factors for postoperative complications.
conclusionCompared with conventional thoracotomy, c-VATS lobectomy brings a lower incidence of postoperative complications, and age, BMI and operation mode were independent risk factors for postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35559392PMC9091098W4285741576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.