ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Meta-analysis of the prognosis after surgical treatment of osteosarcoma complicated by pathologic fracture.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Hydrogels for the Treatment of Bone Osteosarcoma via Localized Drug-Delivery and Tissue Regeneration: A Narrative Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Analysis of prognostic factors and histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the prognosis of surgical treatment of osteosarcoma complicated by pathologic fracture. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe searched articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for studies published up to January 1, 2022, that reported the surgical prognosis of osteosarcoma patients complicated with/without pathologic fracture. The specific outcome indicators used in the meta-analysis included the local recurrence rate (LRR), distant metastasis rate (DMR), overall survival (OS) rate and disease-free survival (DFS) rate after surgical treatment such as amputation or limb salvage in the pathologic fracture group and non-pathologic fracture group. Crude and adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare data between the case group and control group. Fifteen studies and 3839 patients were included in the final meta-analysis.
resultsThe difference between the pathologic fractures group and the non-pathologic fracture group was not statistically significance in LRR analysis (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.88-1.84, P > 0.05); however, a statistically significant difference was found between two groups in DMR (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03-1.95, P < 0.05). For survival rates, the following ORs were found: 3-year OS (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.25-2.35, P < 0.05); 5-year OS (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.06-1.87, P < 0.05); 3-year DFS (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.20-2.94, P < 0.05); and 5-year DFS (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.10-2.03, P < 0.05). The pooled estimate of OR is 1.48 (95% CI: 0.72-3.04, P > 0.05) for local recurrence and 1.82 (95% CI: 0.92-3.60, P > 0.05) for distant metastasis in the amputation group and the limb salvage group for osteosarcoma patients with pathologic fractures, respectively. Our analysis indicated that patients with a pathologic fracture have a higher risk of DMR after surgery, but there is no significant difference in LRR between patients with a pathologic fracture and without. Additionally, in osteosarcoma patients with a pathologic fracture, there was no difference in LDR or DMR between limb-salvage surgery and amputation.
conclusionComplicated with pathologic fracture is a negative prognostic indicator of osteosarcoma, and its poor survival rates (both OS and DFS) may be associated with a higher DMR. For osteosarcoma patients with pathologic fractures treated with standard treatment, LRR and DMR exhibit no significant difference between amputation and limb-salvage surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35559384PMC9091088W4285740622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.