Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35559374›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022

Machine learning-based algorithm demonstrates differences in del19 and L858R EGFR subgroups in non-small cell lung cancer: a single center experience.

Ullas Batra, Shrinidhi Nathany, Mansi Sharma, Anurag Mehta, Surender Dhanda, Joslia T Jose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ullas BatraMedical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India.
Shrinidhi NathanyMolecular Diagnostics, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India.
Mansi SharmaMedical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India.
Anurag MehtaLaboratory Service, Transfusion Medicine and Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India.
Surender DhandaMolecular Diagnostics, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India.
Joslia T JoseMedical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExon del19 and L858R mutations account for 90% of EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LUX lung 3 and 6 initially reported a survival difference between these two. However, other studies did not demonstrate the same. By using machine learning (ML), it is possible to discover novel patterns for cancer susceptibility, recurrence, prognostication, and therapy. We evaluate the effect of these two molecular subtypes on overall survival/progression-free survival (OS/PFS).

methods413 patients with stage IV EGFR mutant NSCLC were analyzed for clinicopathologic features, treatment details, and survival outcome. PFS prediction models were built using ensemble decision trees, and random forest. Ensemble decision trees were built and validation was performed using survival analysis. Clustering regression techniques were then applied to train and test the prediction of the 1

resultsThe median age of the cohort was 59 years comprising 53% males and 47% females. 275 (66.5%) patients showed a del19 mutation type and 138 (33.5%) harbored L858R. After clustering, the most important variables were age (P<0.05), ECOG performance status (PS) (P<0.04), PDL1 (P<0.09), smoking status (P<0.01) and to a lesser extent, number of extrathoracic metastasis (ETM) sites (median 1.2, P<0.06), brain metastasis (P<0.06) and gender (P<0.08). The prediction for 1

conclusionThis study used machine learning modeling with fair accuracy to demonstrate that ECOG PS, age at diagnosis, and smoking status are the three main predictive factors of PFS in these patients.

Indexed as

del19EGFRL858Rmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35559374
PMCPMC9091123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.