ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Application value of modified radical mastectomy in female patients with breast cancer of different molecular types: a prognosis study.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial Transcriptomics Decodes Breast Cancer Microenvironment Heterogeneity: From Multidimensional Dynamic Profiling to Precision Therapy Blueprint Construction.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a Nomogram to predict postoperative flap necrosis risk in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the application values of modified radical mastectomy in female patients with mammary cancer of different molecular types and from this we conducted a prognosis study.
methodsA total of 204 Breast Cancer (BC) patients who were admitted to our hospital from March 2015 to March 2017 were included and divided into Group A (Luminal A type, n = 68), Group B (Luminal B type, n = 48), Group C (ERBB2: Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 + type, n = 42), and Group D (Basal-like type, n = 46) according to their molecular cancer types. Patients in Groups A and B demonstrated superior treatment efficacy and lower incidence of adverse reactions than those in Groups C and D (P < 0.05), while no statistical difference was observed among the 4 groups in terms of the total operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative 48-h drainage volume (P > 0.05). Before treatment, the 4 groups exhibited similar results from the EORTC breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire (EORTCQLQ-BR23) (P > 0.05).
resultsAfter treatment, Group A was superior to the other 3 groups in this regard (P < 0.05). Further, no significant difference was observed among the 4 groups in terms of the prognosis of 3-year survival (P > 0.05).
conclusionThe clinical application of modified radical mastectomy does not depend on the molecular typing of BC; however, the treatment was more effective in the treatment of Luminal A type BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35559370PMC9091099W4285739994What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.