ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Clinical observation of different targeted temperature management methods in patients with cardiac arrest.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the clinical value of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) combined with different targeted temperature management (TTM) for the treatment of cardiac arrest.
methodsFrom January 2018 to September 2020, ECPR was initiated in patients with cardiac arrest who did not have their spontaneous circulation restored after 20 minutes of traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A total of 22 patients (observation group) given TTM were treated with Hico-variotherm 550 (HU 550) and 30 patients (control group) not given TTM were treated with a medical water circulation cooling blanket. The Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) score, serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE), survival rate and neurological prognosis after ECMO weaning were compared between the two groups.
resultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups in GCS score on the third and seventh days after resuscitation and serum NSE on the first and third day after treatment (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the survival rate (40.91% vs 33.33%) and favorable neurological outcome (36.36% vs 26.67%) of patients in the observation group were slightly higher, but the differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The incidence of shivering and body temperature fluctuation during rewarming in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).
conclusionHU550 poikilothermia water cabinet combined with ECMO can better control the targeted temperature of patients in a more accurate range and improve the survival rate; however, it exerts no statistical improvement in the incidence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35559368PMC9091101W4286836263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.