Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35559349›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Biomarkers in Medicines Development-From Discovery to Regulatory Qualification and Beyond.

Natalie M Hendrikse, Jordi Llinares Garcia, Thorsten Vetter, Anthony J Humphreys, Falk Ehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Non-Oncology Biomarkers in Precision Medicine: A Narrative Review.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transforming Drug Development for Neurological Disorders: Proceedings from a Multidisease Area Workshop.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalie M HendrikseRegulatory Science and Innovation Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jordi Llinares GarciaRegulatory Science and Innovation Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Thorsten VetterScientific Advice Office, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anthony J HumphreysRegulatory Science and Innovation Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Falk EhmannRegulatory Science and Innovation Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers are important tools in medicines development and clinical practice. Besides their use in clinical trials, such as for enrichment of patients, monitoring safety or response to treatment, biomarkers are a cornerstone of precision medicine. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) emphasised the importance of the discovery, qualification, and use of biomarkers in their Regulatory Science Strategy to 2025, which included the recommendation to enhance early engagement with biomarker developers to facilitate regulatory qualification. This study explores the journey of biomarkers through the EU regulatory system and beyond, based on a review of interactions between developers and the EMA from 2008 to 2020, as well as the use of qualified biomarkers in clinical trials. Of applicants that used early interaction platforms such as the Innovation Task Force, less than half engaged in fee-related follow-up procedures. Results showed that, as compared to companies, consortia were more likely to opt for the Qualification of Novel Methodologies procedure and engage in follow-up procedures. Our results highlight the importance of early engagement with regulators for achieving biomarker qualification, including pre-submission discussions in the context of the qualification procedure. A review of clinical trials showed that all qualified biomarkers are used in practice, although not always according to the endorsed context of use. Overall, this study highlights important aspects of biomarker qualification, including opportunities to improve the seamless support for developers by EMA. The use of qualified biomarkers in clinical trials underlines the importance of regulatory qualification, which will further enable precision medicine for the benefit of patients.

Indexed as

biomarker qualificationbiomarkersEuropean Medicines AgencyInnovation Task ForceQualification of Novel Methodologiesregulatory science

Identifiers

PMID35559349
PMCPMC9086587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.