A sensitive electrochemical assay for T4 polynucleotide kinase activity based on titanium dioxide nanotubes and a rolling circle amplification strategy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

1. An electrochemical biosensor for T4 polynucleotide kinase activity identification according to host-guest recognition among phosphate pillar[5]arene@palladium nanoparticles@reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite and toluidine blue.Mikrochimica acta · 2023
   Article
2. A label-free T4 polynucleotide kinase fluorescence sensor based on split dimeric G-quadruplex and ligation-induced dimeric G-quadruplex/thioflavin T conformation.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract