Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35558684›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2022

Dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: five lessons from the European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.

Jana D Javakhishvili, Filip Arnberg, Neil Greenberg, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Annett Lotzin, Miguel Xavier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Jana D JavakhishviliInstitute of Addiction Studies, School of Arts and Science, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-7582
Filip ArnbergNational Centre for Disaster Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1317-2093
Neil GreenbergKing's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-2971
Evaldas KazlauskasCenter for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-6220
Annett LotzinDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2834-8047
Miguel XavierFaculty of Medical Sciences, NOVA Medical School, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2698-1284
Ilia State University · GEKing's College London · GBUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Lisbon · PTUppsala University · SEVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper provides insights into the mental health consequences of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic from the Central, Eastern, Nordic, Southern, and Western subregions of Europe, represented by five member countries of the European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). On the basis of the existing national research and experiences in these countries, we propose five lessons learned. (1) There is no evidence of a mental health pandemic so far in the countries in focus. No increase in severe mental disorders but some increase in the symptoms of common mental health disorders are observable. More high-quality longitudinal studies are needed to understand the mental health burden of the pandemic. (2) The pandemic affects countries (including the mental health situation) differently, depending on the level of the exposure, management policies, pre-pandemic structural characteristics, and healthcare resources. (3) The pandemic affects people differently: the exposure severity to pandemic-related stressors differs between individuals, as well as individual resources to cope with these stressors. There are winners and losers as well as identifiable at-risk groups that need particular attention. (4) Besides the negative consequences, the pandemic has had a positive impact. The rapidly applied innovations within the system of healthcare responses provide a window of opportunity for positive changes in mental healthcare policies, strategies, and practices. The increased focus on mental health during the pandemic may contribute to the prioritization of mental health issues at policy-making and organizational levels and may reduce stigma. (5) A stress- and trauma-informed response to COVID-19 is required. The European community of psychotraumatologists under the leadership of ESTSS plays an important role in promoting stress- and trauma-informed healthcare and policies of pandemic management. Based on the lessons learned, we propose a stepped-care public mental health model for the prevention of adverse mental health outcomes during pandemics. HIGHLIGHTS: Population mental health is affected differently in the COVID-19 pandemic: there are winners and losers, as well as identifiable at-risk groups that need particular attention.A stress- and trauma-informed public mental health stepped-care model can address pandemic-related mental health burden in a systematic way.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2COVID-19EuropeHumansMental HealthPandemicsStress, PsychologicalCOVID-19ESTSSEuropepandemicpublic mental healthstress-informedtrauma-informed

Identifiers

PMID35558684
PMCPMC9090369
OpenAlexW4225297166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.