Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35558532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Social Participation of High Risk-Adults in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Dominik Schröder, Gloria Heesen, Stephanie Heinemann, Eva Hummers, Alexandra Jablonka, Sandra Steffens, Marie Mikuteit, Jacqueline Niewolik, Tobias R Overbeck, Jonathan Kallusky and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dominik SchröderDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Gloria HeesenDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Stephanie HeinemannDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Eva HummersDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Alexandra JablonkaDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Sandra SteffensDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Marie MikuteitDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Jacqueline NiewolikDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Tobias R OverbeckDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Jonathan KalluskyDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Frank MüllerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Restrictions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic affect the social participation of people worldwide. Especially those at high risk for a severe disease tend to abstain from social gatherings. While there are a few questionnaires to measure social participation in elderly or chronic patients, a valid survey instrument that includes pandemic-related social participation is needed. Methods: We developed a social participation questionnaire that aims to assess pandemic-related restrictions in social participation. Items were developed using a theory and literature-based approach and then compiled in a discursive process involving experts and lay people. This was followed by the validation of the questionnaire through a cross-sectional survey on 431 individuals. Items with low item-total correlations and low factor loadings using exploratory factor analysis [EFA] were excluded. Using EFA on the remaining items, the factor structure was retrieved and tested with a confirmatory factor analysis [CFA]. Internal consistency was assessed with Chronbachs α. Results: Initially, 27 items were developed which were used for validation. 13 items were excluded due to low item-total correlations and factors loadings. EFA of the remaining 14 items revealed three factors which were identified as domains "active social participation," "wellbeing," and "restrictions". CFA showed an acceptable model fit using the three-dimensional structure. Chronbachs α of 0.81 and McDonalds Ω of 0.87 indicate good internal consistency. Correlation analysis showed an association between the developed questionnaire and previously-established participation and mental health scales. Conclusion: This study suggests that our 14 item questionnaire is of high reliability and validity and can be used to measure social participation during a pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansPandemicsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSocial ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19pandemic questionnairequality of lifequestionnaire development and validationquestionnaire validationSARS-CoV-2social participation

Identifiers

PMID35558532
PMCPMC9086897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.