Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35558419›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients.

Qingming Liu, Huimeng Sun, Yitian Hu, Qiongyao Wang, Zhiyong Zhao, Da Dong, Ying Shen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06372288 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Methamphetamine Use Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarilion ClinicRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsMethamphetamine AbuseArmsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation, Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
NCT06830980 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder in People Living With HIV

TypeinterventionalSponsorGopalkumar RakeshRan2025 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsMethamphetamine Use Disorders, HIVArmsintermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), Sham TMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qingming LiuCenter for Brain, Mind and Education, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Huimeng SunSchool of Teacher Education, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Yitian HuSchool of Teacher Education, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Qiongyao WangSchool of Teacher Education, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Zhiyong ZhaoKey Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Da DongCenter for Brain, Mind and Education, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Ying ShenRehabilitation Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: In this brief report, we compare the effectiveness and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and conventional 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD). Our study suggests that iTBS would also reduce drug craving in patients with MAUD just as the 10 Hz; thus, there may be no difference in treatment effects between these two methods. Methods: In total twenty male methamphetamine (MA) addicts were randomly assigned to iTBS ( Results: The results showed that iTBS and 10 Hz treatment had similar effectiveness in reducing cue-induced craving in male addicts for MA. Both 10 Hz and iTBS improved withdrawal symptoms of patients with MAUD. Conclusions: Intermittent theta burst stimulation may be similar in effectiveness as 10 Hz in treating patients with MAUD. The clinical usefulness of rTMS could be improved substantially because of the increase in its capacity, cost, and accessibility. Importantly, the effectiveness of rTMS in the treatment of patients with MAUD is not yet proven, and should be tested in the large double-blind sham-controlled studies.

Indexed as

addictioniTBSmethamphetamine use disorderrTMSsubstance abuse

Identifiers

PMID35558419
PMCPMC9087275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.