Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35558364›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Visual Function Score: A New Clinical Tool to Assess Visual Function and Detect Visual Disorders in Children.

Sabrina Signorini, Antonella Luparia, Giulia Cappagli, Eleonora Perotto, Mauro Antonini, Federica Morelli, Giorgia Aprile, Elena Ballante, Silvia Figini, Renato Borgatti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) overlooked: A retrospective review of missed opportunities to diagnose CVI.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sabrina SignoriniDevelopmental Neuro-ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Antonella LupariaDevelopmental Neuro-ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Giulia CappagliDevelopmental Neuro-ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Eleonora PerottoDevelopmental Neuro-ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Mauro AntoniniDevelopmental Neuro-ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Federica MorelliDevelopmental Neuro-ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Giorgia AprileDevelopmental Neuro-ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Elena BallanteBioData Science Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Silvia FiginiBioData Science Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Renato BorgattiChild Neuropsychiatry Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
VFS Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A comprehensive assessment of visual functioning at an early age is important not only for identifying and defining visual impairment but also for planning personalized rehabilitation programs based on the visual diagnosis. Since existing tools to evaluate visual functioning present some important limitations (e.g., they are based on qualitative reports, they do not take into account environmental adaptations of visual testing or they have not been formally validated as clinical instruments), the present work has the main aim to propose a new clinical tool ( Methods: The Visual Function Score was administered to one hundred visually impaired children (age range 4 months to 17.75 years old) in the form of a professional-reported protocol for a total of 51 items, each of which is assigned a score from 1 to 9 (or from 0 to 9 in some specific cases). The VFS produces three sub-scores and a global score (from 0 to 100), resulting in a quantitative evaluation of visual functioning. Results: The VFS can detect the well-known differences between different types of visual impairment (cerebral, oculomotor, and peripheral or grouped as central and peripheral) and takes into account different environments in the definition of a quantitative score of visual functioning. Discussion: Overall, the use of a quantitative tool to evaluate visual functions and functional vision such as the VFS would be fundamental to monitor the progresses of patients over time in response to rehabilitation interventions.

Indexed as

developmentenvironmental adaptationfunctional visionrehabilitationvisual functionvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID35558364
PMCPMC9087345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.