Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35558157›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering

Performance of an auto-adjusting prosthetic socket during walking with intermittent socket release.

Ethan J Weathersby, Andrew C Vamos, Brian G Larsen, Jake B McLean, Ryan V Carter, Katheryn J Allyn, Daniel Ballesteros, Horace Wang, Nicholas S deGrasse, Janna L Friedly and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Testing an adjustable prosthetic socket in a simulated military environment.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ethan J WeathersbyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew C VamosDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian G LarsenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jake B McLeanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ryan V CarterDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katheryn J AllynDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Daniel BallesterosDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0299-6775
Horace WangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicholas S deGrasseDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Janna L FriedlyDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian J HafnerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph L GarbiniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marcia A CiolDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joan E SandersDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-243X
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A challenge in the engineering of auto-adjusting prosthetic sockets is to maintain stable operation of the control system while users change their bodily position and activity. The purpose of this study was to test the stability of a socket that automatically adjusted socket size to maintain fit. Socket release during sitting was conducted between bouts of walking. Methods: Adjustable sockets with sensors that monitored distance between the liner and socket were fabricated. Motor-driven panels and a microprocessor-based control system adjusted socket size during walking to maintain a target sensed distance. Limb fluid volume was recorded continuously. During eight sit/walk cycles, the socket panels were released upon sitting and then returned to position for walking, either the size at the end of the prior bout or a size 1.0% larger in volume. Results: In six transtibial prosthesis users, the control system maintained stable operation and did not saturate (move to and remain at the end of the actuator's range) during 98% of the walking bouts. Limb fluid volume changes generally matched the panel position changes executed by the control system. Conclusions: Stable operation of the control system suggests that the auto-adjusting socket is ready for testing in users' at-home settings.

Indexed as

adjustable socketamputeecontrol systeminterface stresspistoningpressureprosthesisprostheticresidual limbsocket fitsocket releasetrans-tibialvolume accommodation

Identifiers

PMID35558157
PMCPMC9087223
OpenAlexW4280577752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.