Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35558134›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Phylogeny, Evolution, and Transmission Dynamics of Canine and Feline Coronaviruses: A Retro-Prospective Study.

Hu Yang, Qianling Peng, Yifei Lang, SenYan Du, SanJie Cao, Rui Wu, Qin Zhao, Xiaobo Huang, Yiping Wen, Juchun Lin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hu YangSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Qianling PengSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yifei LangSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
SenYan DuSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
SanJie CaoSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Rui WuSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Qin ZhaoSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaobo HuangSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yiping WenSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Juchun LinKey Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Shan ZhaoSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Qigui YanSwine Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine coronavirus (CCoV) and feline coronavirus (FCoV) are endemic in companion animals. Due to their high mutation rates and tendencies of genome recombination, they pose potential threats to public health. The molecular characteristics and genetic variation of both CCoV and FCoV have been thoroughly studied, but their origin and evolutionary dynamics still require further assessment. In the present study, we applied a comprehensive approach and analyzed the S, M, and N genes of different CCoV/FCoV isolates. Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) and phylogenetic analysis showed that the FCoV sequences from Chinese isolates were closely related to the FCoV clusters in Netherlands, while recombination analysis indicated that of S N-terminal domain (NTD) was the most susceptible region of mutation, and recombination of this region is an important cause of the emergence of new lineages. Natural selection showed that CCoV and FCoV subgenotypes were in selection constraints, and CCoV-IIb was in strong positive selection. Phylodynamics showed that the mean evolution rate of S1 genes of CCoV and FCoV was 1.281 × 10

Indexed as

BEASTcanine coronavirusDAPCfeline coronavirusphylodynamicsphylogenyrecombination

Identifiers

PMID35558134
PMCPMC9087556
OpenAlexW4286841734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.