Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35558105›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Discovery of Natural Products With Antifungal Potential Through Combinatorial Synergy.

Catheryn R Augostine, Simon V Avery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Baicalein combined with azoles against fungiFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Recent innovations and challenges in the treatment of fungal infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The bioactivities of sclareol: A mini review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catheryn R AugostineSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Simon V AverySchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing prevalence of antifungal drug resistance coupled with the slow development of new, acceptable drugs and fungicides has raised interest in natural products (NPs) for their therapeutic potential and level of acceptability. However, a number of well-studied NPs are considered promiscuous molecules. In this study, the advantages of drug-drug synergy were exploited for the discovery of pairwise NP combinations with potentiated antifungal activity and, potentially, increased target specificity. A rational approach informed by previously known mechanisms of action of selected NPs did not yield novel antifungal synergies. In contrast, a high-throughput screening approach with yeast revealed 34 potential synergies from 800 combinations of a diverse NP library with four selected NPs of interest (eugenol, EUG; β-escin, ESC; curcumin, CUR; berberine hydrochloride, BER). Dedicated assays validated the most promising synergies, namely, EUG + BER, CUR + sclareol, and BER + pterostilbene (PTE) [fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) indices ≤ 0.5 in all cases], reduced to as low as 35 (BER) and 7.9 mg L

Indexed as

crop pathogensdrug combinationsfungal pathogensfungicide combinationsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeZygosaccharomyces bailii

Identifiers

PMID35558105
PMCPMC9087349
OpenAlexW4285740858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.