Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35558101›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Profiling of the Conjunctival Bacterial Microbiota Reveals the Feasibility of Utilizing a Microbiome-Based Machine Learning Model to Differentially Diagnose Microbial Keratitis and the Core Components of the Conjunctival Bacterial Interaction Network.

Zhichao Ren, Wenfeng Li, Qing Liu, Yanling Dong, Yusen Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhichao RenQingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, China.
Wenfeng LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Qing LiuQingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, China.
Yanling DongQingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, China.
Yusen HuangQingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, China.
Shandong First Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNShandong Eye Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both healthy and diseased human ocular surfaces possess their own microbiota. If allowed, opportunistic pathogens within the ocular microbiota may cause microbial keratitis (MK). However, the nonpathogenic component of the ocular microbiota has been proven to undermine the performance of culture, the gold standard of the etiological diagnosis for MK. As the conjunctival bacterial microbiota generates unique alterations with various oculopathies, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of distinguishing MK using machine learning based on the characteristics of the conjunctival bacterial microbiome associated with various types of MK. This study also aimed to reveal which bacterial genera constitute the core of the interaction network of the conjunctival bacterial microbiome. Conjunctival swabs collected from the diseased eyes of MK patients and the randomly chosen normal eyes of healthy volunteers were subjected for high-throughput 16S rDNA sequencing. The relative content of each bacterial genus and the composition of bacterial gene functions in every sample were used to establish identification models with the random forest algorithm. Tenfold cross validation was adopted. Accuracy was 96.25% using the bacterial microbiota structure and 93.75% using the bacterial gene functional composition. Therefore, machine learning with the conjunctival bacterial microbiome characteristics might be used for differentiation of MKs as a noninvasive supplementary approach. In addition, this study found that

Indexed as

KeratitisMicrobiotaBacteriaConjunctivaFeasibility StudiesHumansMachine LearningRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Score microbiotadiagnosiskinless hubsmachine learningmicrobial keratitisocular microbiome

Identifiers

PMID35558101
PMCPMC9086711
OpenAlexW4224860153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.