Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35557998›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in reading2021

Selective visual attention skills differentially predict decoding and reading comprehension performance across reading ability profiles.

Hope Sparks Lancaster, Jing Li, Shelley Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in reading, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hope Sparks LancasterCenter of Childhood Deafness, Language, and Learning, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, USA and Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9924-9508
Jing LiH. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shelley GrayProgram of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

Genotype-Phenotype Associations in Reading DisordersF32HD089674 · NICHD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI LANCASTER, HOPE SPARKS · 2017 to 2019
$189k
Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD089674Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between selective visual attention (SVA), reading decoding, listening comprehension and reading comprehension in children with and without a reading disorder. Methods: We used longitudinal data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. We split children into four groups: Typical Readers, Dyslexics, Poor Comprehenders and Comorbid Reading Disorder. We included measures of single word reading, nonword reading, spelling, phonological processing, vocabulary, receptive language, nonverbal intelligence, selective attention and reading comprehension. We used analysis of variance, correlations and structural equation modelling to examine the relationship between SVA and reading. We fit two possible models: SVA Indirect and SVA Direct. The difference between these models was the inclusion of a direct path from SVA to reading comprehension. Results: We examined an indirect model, where SVA predicted reading comprehension through word decoding and listening comprehension, and a direct model, which included a pathway from SVA to reading comprehension. Based on our analysis of variance and correlation results, we collapsed the Dyslexic, Poor Comprehenders and Comorbid Reading Disorder groups for the structural equation modelling. We found evidence that for Typical Readers, an indirect model was the best fit, whereas the direct model was the best model for children with a reading disorder. Conclusions: Selective visual attention is related to reading comprehension. This relationship differs for children with and without a reading disorder.

Indexed as

ALSPACdyslexiapoor comprehenderreading comprehensionselective visual attention

Identifiers

PMID35557998
PMCPMC9090198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.