ReviewRSC advances2019
A walk around the application of nanocatalysts for cross-dehydrogenative coupling of C-H bonds.
Review in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneous Photocatalysis as a Potent Tool for Organic Synthesis: Cross-Dehydrogenative C-C Coupling ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Recent developments in green approaches for sustainable synthesis of indole-derived scaffolds.Molecular diversity · 2022Review
- Employing of FeMolecular diversity · 2022Article
- PANI-FeMolecular diversity · 2022Article
- Progress and recent trends in the direct selenocyanation of (hetero)aromatic C-H bonds.RSC advances · 2021Review
- Vicinal halo-trifluoromethylation of alkenes.RSC advances · 2021Review
- Review
- Recent progress in application of nanocatalysts for carbonylative Suzuki cross-coupling reactions.RSC advances · 2021Review
- Recent trends in the direct oxyphosphorylation of C-C multiple bonds.RSC advances · 2020Review
- Direct sulfonamidation of (hetero)aromatic C-H bonds with sulfonyl azides: a novel and efficient route toRSC advances · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions between two unmodified C-H bonds are one of the most attractive and fundamental strategies for the construction of C-C bonds. As these reactions avoid pre-functionalization and de-functionalization of the substrates, they are cleaner, safer, and faster than traditional cross-coupling reactions. After the introduction of the modern area of cross-dehydrogenative coupling in 2003, many efforts have been devoted to the development of more efficient and selective catalytic systems for these appealing reactions. Among the different types of catalytic systems that have been investigated, nanostructured metal catalysts are highly attractive in view of their high catalytic performance, easy separability and good reusability. The purpose of this review is to focus on the application of nanocatalysts for cross-dehydrogenative coupling of C-H bonds with particular emphasis on the mechanistic aspects of the reactions. Specifically, we have structured this review based on the type of C-C bonds. Thus, the review is divided into six major sections: (i) C(sp
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.