ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022
Clinical outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for patients with cT1aN0M0 esophageal cancer unsuitable for endoscopic resection and surgery.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Superficial Esophageal Cancer Completely Cured With Radiotherapy Alone: A Case Report.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy in Patients with Stage T1bN0M0 Esophageal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Photodynamic therapy as a promising treatment for long-segment and whole-circumferential early esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of Recurrence Patterns and Salvage Treatments After Definitive Radiotherapy for cT1a and cT1bN0M0 Esophageal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies on the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy for clinical (c)T1aN0M0 ( Methods: Patients with cT1aN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent definitive RT or CRT between January 2009 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The initial response, toxicities, survival rates, recurrence patterns, and salvage treatments of the patients were evaluated. Initial response was measured using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guideline. Toxicity was assessed and documented following the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Survival rates from the date of initiation of treatment were measured using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Twenty patients treated with definitive RT or CRT were included in the study. The median follow-up duration was 55 months (range, 13-131 months). All patients achieved complete response to the initial treatment. Grade 3 acute toxicities observed esophagitis (10%), pneumonitis (5%), and leukopenia (5%). Late toxicities higher than grade 3 were not observed. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 100% and 100%, 83% and 100%, and 67% and 100%, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Among the 20 patients, 6 showed local recurrence and 2 showed metachronous recurrence. Seven patients underwent salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and one underwent argon plasma coagulation treatment. After the endoscopic treatment, no recurrences were observed. Conclusions: Definitive RT or CRT was considered an alternative initial treatment for patients with cT1aN0M0 EC who were unsuitable for endoscopic resection and surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.